Re: XFormsView

2001-07-03 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 03-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > the methods in LyXGUI have not been GUII'fied yet... > > most likely a method createMainView will be added to GUIRuntime: > > xforms: > LyXView * createMainView(int a, int b) { > return new XFormsView(a, b); > } > > qt2: > LyXView * createMa

Re: XFormsView

2001-07-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 03-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > This patch, with the (close to) minimal amount of changes needed: | > | | So how do you plan to do this if the qt2 view is called QtView.h? | We then have to use preprocessor symbols? I still opt to c

RE: XFormsView

2001-07-03 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 03-Jul-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > This patch, with the (close to) minimal amount of changes needed: > So how do you plan to do this if the qt2 view is called QtView.h? We then have to use preprocessor symbols? I still opt to call it LyXView! Jürgen Index: src/lyx_gui.C ==

Re: XFormsView

2001-07-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> This patch, with the (close to) minimal amount of changes | Lars> needed: | | Is there a reason why Toolbar::Pimpl::owner is not a XFormsView*? That | would avoid static

Re: XFormsView

2001-07-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> This patch, with the (close to) minimal amount of changes Lars> needed: Is there a reason why Toolbar::Pimpl::owner is not a XFormsView*? That would avoid static_casting. JMarc