Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I had a fast look and what I don't like is all this some option
> > stuff couldn't that be handled with something like ,
> > as this seems much nicer too me!
>
This is precisely why this output is handled by a small function that I
can redefine at will.
> I think Pi
> I had a fast look and what I don't like is all this some option
> stuff couldn't that be handled with something like ,
> as this seems much nicer too me!
I think Pierre-Olivier got it right in general. It is some kind of
religious debate on what goes in ... and what goes in "...".
The best ru
On 12-Oct-2000 Gaillard Pierre-Olivier wrote:
> Hello,
Hello Pierre-Olivier!
>
> Here is a sample output of the new XML output I have added to my LyX
> copy.
> This has been produced by a patched version of LyX that uses
> XMLSAXPrettifier (which at the moment does not make pretty output, so
