On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 01:16:50AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> let me guess, you still develop creator under vim and gdb ;)
For debugging I am really eating my own dog food. Editing is by now
about 50/50 real vim/fakevim, mostly depending on whether I expect
a lot of navigation, tendency falling.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:28:05PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Richard Heck wrote:
> > > On 04/14/2011 08:36 AM, venom00 wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Suggestion: use Qt Creator. I think it's the best solution.
> > >>
> > > That's what I use, though under Linux, and it is very good
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 05:28:05PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
> > On 04/14/2011 08:36 AM, venom00 wrote:
> >>
> >> Suggestion: use Qt Creator. I think it's the best solution.
> >>
> > That's what I use, though under Linux, and it is very good indeed.
>
> and Andre will get dru
Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 08:36 AM, venom00 wrote:
>>
>> Suggestion: use Qt Creator. I think it's the best solution.
>>
> That's what I use, though under Linux, and it is very good indeed.
and Andre will get drunken tonight ;) p
On 14-4-2011 14:36, venom00 wrote:
>> 1. Download CMake if you haven't done it yet and Install:
>> http://www.cmake.org/cmake/resources/software.html.
>> 2. Download and install Qt.
>> 3. Either run CMake Gui, and set "Where is the source code"
>> to "/lyx/development/cmake" and set "Where to
>>
On 04/14/2011 08:36 AM, venom00 wrote:
Suggestion: use Qt Creator. I think it's the best solution.
That's what I use, though under Linux, and it is very good indeed.
Richard
On 04/14/2011 05:03 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
To be clear, I don't think that LyX will ever care to provide such a
trivial option in the Prefs. (I hope it won't!)
See the other thread on how there are too many options already!
Richard
> 1. Download CMake if you haven't done it yet and Install:
> http://www.cmake.org/cmake/resources/software.html.
> 2. Download and install Qt.
> 3. Either run CMake Gui, and set "Where is the source code"
> to "/lyx/development/cmake" and set "Where to
> build binaries" to "/build/development/c
>> What's lacking ?
>
> 1) I want to use Windows and Visual Studio 2010 to code (I personally like
> this idea because of the debugging features of this IDE).
I do that as well.
> But I need to pass thru several steps before generate the "Solution" for
> Visual Studio (all that thing with deve
> What's lacking ?
Well. At first is lacking time to me. :-)
But, let me see...
1) I want to use Windows and Visual Studio 2010 to code (I personally like
this idea because of the debugging features of this IDE).
But I need to pass thru several steps before generate the "Solution" for
Visual Stud
>
> I'm very interested. I have tons of ideas, but I still have problems to set
> up a confortable environment to start to code.
What's lacking ?
> Another problem is that I'm still trying to understand some pieces of code,
> so it will take some time for me to really contribute with some new
> maybe I'm a bit old fashioned (born in 1943 ;-). So I do not have
this terrible need to do everyzhing the fastest way possible.
I'm young (born in the 80's) and I confess I'm neurotic about automatization
(much over the normal). Sorry if I am too boring sometimes.
I enjoy to make the computer de
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Diego Queiroz wrote:
> Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right?
> As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything
> should be fine. Believe on me. :-)
> And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose
> the
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Sam Lewis
wrote:
>> IMO, we need to improve the functionality of
>> LyX, and not block good ideas.
>
> Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on
> functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it
> needs t
> You loose. LyX adds a number.
It was just an example. If LyX adds an ID or not, it doesn't really matter.
There is no link between the number and the contents of the document.
> If not for complete rejection, so at least to priorize on what is
important.
You're right. But I'm not trying to con
> IMO, we need to improve the functionality of
> LyX, and not block good ideas.
Of course everybody is welcome to make suggestions and put forward ideas on
functionality. But it does not mean that everything gets implemented; it needs
to be realistic and accepted by the community of users and de
Hellmut, this behavior is not a rule, right?
As a programmer I assure you: once things are correctly handled, everything
should be fine. Believe on me. :-)
And I repeat, it is just a guess for a name to the file, LyX won't impose
the filename.
An option to disable this feature is welcome (for thos
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Sam Lewis
wrote:
> Inon Sharony TAU.ac.IL> writes:
>
>
>> As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the
>> \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file
>> should be saved as.
>>
>> Do you agree?
>
> No really. I
Inon Sharony TAU.ac.IL> writes:
> As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the
> \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file
> should be saved as.
>
> Do you agree?
No really. I normally add the title as the last thing, long after havin
Le 08/04/11 21:04, Diego Queiroz a écrit :
But this should not be a big deal.
Every general purpose system has lots of options and customizations.
LyX has an option to set if you prefer a single close button instead of
one for each tab, so what's wrong in adding a new option like this?
I think
But this should not be a big deal.
Every general purpose system has lots of options and customizations.
LyX has an option to set if you prefer a single close button instead of one
for each tab, so what's wrong in adding a new option like this?
We will always need to think how to organize the opti
I think this is a good idea.
It can also be an option to the user, this way he/she decides if this is useful
or not.
I agree. But I think there are _TOO_ much options in LyX, we shouldn't add an
option for such a small thing.
venom00
Liviu.
It doesn't really matter if it can be guessed or not due to the presence or
absense of \title environment.
If the \title environment is present, it may guess, otherwise, it don't.
MS Office also try to guess the name based on the first sentence, if the
document does not have a title.
I th
Hello
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Inon Sharony wrote:
> Hey LyX developers!
>
> As in MS (boo!) Office, when saving a new file, whatever appears in the
> \title section should automatically be guessed as the name that the file
> should be saved as.
>
> Do you agree?
>
I'd rather not. This may
24 matches
Mail list logo
