RE: Re: menu structure

2008-09-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
> I think that either we build something based on likes/dislikes, > or something based on HIGs. In the later case, I am happy to be > involved, in the earlier case I will not be involved very much > (but just as happy). You're right, but: - In the thread it was also mentioned that we would like

RE: Re: menu structure

2008-09-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
> Sorry (really), can you please tell me (again) which items you don't see fit? These could be in Document/Tools: [Edit] Spellcheck [Edit] Thesaurus [Edit] Change tracking [File] Statistics This one Document/Format: [File] Document Settings Somewhere else in the File menu: [File] New Window [Fil

RE: Re: menu structure

2008-09-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
> And I disklike a document-menu: > It breaks the cross-platform HIG concept of File - View - > Window menus, and I do not understand what is the difference > between a file and a document. You may dislike it. I never said it has to be a Document menu; never said that it is very common to have a

RE: Re: menu structure

2008-09-17 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW
> > Maybe, it is a HIG interpretation thing, but I'm seriously doubting > > that the HIG says that content-related stuff like the "Document settings..." > > must be in the File menu. > > Correct. (but I still think it is the right place) > > > Things like page setup do not influence the conten