Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:03:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Does this work for you? (Everything is, of course, fine here.)
>
> Couldn't you simply
>
> #define POPEN ::popen
> #define POPEN ::_popen
> #define POPEN bark
>
> and use
>
> FILE * inf = POPEN(cmd.c_str()
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 05:03:57PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Does this work for you? (Everything is, of course, fine here.)
Couldn't you simply
#define POPEN ::popen
#define POPEN ::_popen
#define POPEN bark
and use
FILE * inf = POPEN(cmd.c_str(), os::popen_read_mode());
instead
> Does this work for you? (Everything is, of course, fine here.)
>
> If so, please post your local changes to config.h and I'll update
> development/Win32 accordingly. (I'll remove win32_kludge.diff also.)
>
> --
> Angus
>
Here's the patch to config.h. Everything builds fine, and it's nice to
Rob Bearman wrote:
>> I propose to modify configure.ac as attached so that running
>> autogen.sh produces the also attached changes to the generated
>> src/config.h.in. You don't actually run autogen.sh at all of
>> course, but I
>> anticipate that you'd use these config.h.in changes as a
>> templ
> I propose to modify configure.ac as attached so that running
> autogen.sh produces the also attached changes to the generated
> src/config.h.in. You don't actually run autogen.sh at all of
> course, but I
> anticipate that you'd use these config.h.in changes as a
> template with
> which to
Rob Bearman wrote:
>> And is this definition telling the truth? Ie, do you have the mktemp
>> function as well as the _mktemp function?
>
> I should note that for filetools.C, I must prepend the underscore on
> popen and pclose. That might not have been clear since I stated that the
> existing kl
> And is this definition telling the truth? Ie, do you have the mktemp
> function as well as the _mktemp function?
I should note that for filetools.C, I must prepend the underscore on
popen and pclose. That might not have been clear since I stated that the
existing kludge isn't necessary.
Thanks
> And is this definition telling the truth? Ie, do you have the mktemp
> function as well as the _mktemp function?
Yes.
Rob Bearman wrote:
>> Rob,
>>
>> same idea but this time for tempname.C. It appears from the
>> docs that we just need a few underscores. Does the attached
>> patch enable you to compile?
> Almost. Trivially, the "#if[n]def (_WIN32)" should be "#if[n]def _WIN32"
> or the other variety that acce
> Rob,
>
> same idea but this time for tempname.C. It appears from the
> docs that we
> just need a few underscores. Does the attached patch enable
> you to compile?
>
> mktemp:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-
> us/vclib/html/_crt__mktemp.2c_._wmktemp.asp
> Equ
10 matches
Mail list logo
