Re: [patch] remove qt2 support

2006-03-21 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 18. März 2006 14:22 schrieb Georg Baum: > Am Freitag, 17. März 2006 21:42 schrieb Leuven, E.: > > if qt2 goes, the attached should go (in) as well i think (i.e. remove > qgridview.[Ch]) > > You are right. I did not know that we had these classes! The full patch > would look like the

Re: [patch] remove qt2 support

2006-03-18 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 17. März 2006 21:42 schrieb Leuven, E.: > if qt2 goes, the attached should go (in) as well i think (i.e. remove qgridview.[Ch]) You are right. I did not know that we had these classes! The full patch would look like the attached. Dou you have commit privileges now, or should I commi

RE: [patch] remove qt2 support

2006-03-17 Thread Leuven, E.
Title: RE: [patch] remove qt2 support if qt2 goes, the attached should go (in) as well i think (i.e. remove qgridview.[Ch]) edwin Index: qgridview.h === --- qgridview.h (revision 13415) +++ qgridview.h (working copy

Re: [patch] remove qt2 support

2006-03-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This patch removes qt2 support as discussed two weeks ago. It does not | touch the ui files, these should IMHO only be converted if they are | edited anyway. It does neither remove deprecated function calls, e.g. | QApplication::clipboard()->setSelection