> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> I'll be away from my test machine for a while, so it'll be a
Bennett> couple weeks before I can give a definite answer. I looked
Bennett> quickly at it after you committed the patch, and I didn't
Bennett> notice any difference.
On Jun 24, 2005, at 11:03 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The two patches are now applied. Bennett, you said at the time
that the fontcache patch make things worse. If this is still true,
I can keep the fontcache for qt/mac.
Bennett> It
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The two patches are now applied. Bennett, you said at the time
>> that the fontcache patch make things worse. If this is still true,
>> I can keep the fontcache for qt/mac.
Bennett> It does feel slower. These are the results I'm now
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> I'm not sure if this is related, but valgrind also reports
Juergen> some leaks which look like they are related to font handling
Juergen> (I do not really understand its output, so I might be wrong).
Juergen> Attached is
> >> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Bennett> From what I can tell, it comes down to this. Rob is using
> > Bennett> Mac OS X 10.4 (=Darwin 8.0.0), whereas I use
> 10.3.9 (= Darwin
> > Bennett> 7.9.0).
> >
> > Do you use the same Qt version? Is it compiled in the
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Rob, could you try to run LyX under Tiger's Shark.app? The time in
>> lengthcombox.C does not seem to make sense to me.
Bennett> I did that, and the 65% is for Rob's version. Here's a bit
Bennett> more detail:
| | | | | | | | | | |
On Jun 14, 2005, at 8:50 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> From what I can tell, it comes down to this. Rob is using
Bennett> Mac OS X 10.4 (=Darwin 8.0.0), whereas I use 10.3.9 (= Darwin
Bennett> 7.9.0).
Do you use the same Qt ver
> "Bennett" == Bennett Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bennett> Rob kindly provided me with his config.log and the lyx
Bennett> application he compiled to see what the differences were.
I was about to suggest that.
Bennett> His version does run much faster on my machine than mine
Bennett> d
On Jun 10, 2005, at 5:24 PM, Rob Bearman wrote:
I've been building with exactly the configuration specified in the
README.MacOSX file. I thought at one time I needed
--disable-concept-checks,
but it turns out I've been mistakenly leaving off the 's' at the end
for
some time (which I guess mean
On 6/10/05 12:32 PM, "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a 512MB iMac G4 (1.25GHz); it's surely not my hardware that's
> the issue.
>
> Perhaps it's the configuration. Here's what I've got (compiled with
> gcc-3.3):
>
> ./configure --with-frontend=qt --without-x
> --prefix=/Applica
On Jun 10, 2005, at 1:55 PM, Rob Bearman wrote:
I've been building 1.4 on the Mac (against qt-mac-free-3.3.4) for
comparison
purposes but I haven't seen any glaring perf problems. Forgive me if
I'm
confusing the issue by not having followed this thread carefully, but
I've
run the latest build
On 6/10/05 9:36 AM, "Bennett Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, frankly, the difference in speed introduced with the fontcache
> patch is trivial compared to the slowness of lyx-140 overall: it really
> is unusable on the Mac, and something else must account for the
> slowness.
>
> I'd love
Bennett Helm wrote:
> But, frankly, the difference in speed introduced with the fontcache
> patch is trivial compared to the slowness of lyx-140 overall: it really
> is unusable on the Mac, and something else must account for the
> slowness.
I'm not sure if this is related, but valgrind also repor
On Jun 10, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> The following patch reduces the number of calls to getFont
Jean-Marc> by the two following means:
Jean-Marc> For your enjoyment, I also attach the patch that re
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Personally, I'm not going to try compiling LyX/Win 1.4.x until
Angus> 1.3.6 is released. Maybe you can lean on Rob Bearman...
We'll see if someone complains. Actually, what would be useful is
someone running a profiler on LyX/Win.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc> The following patch reduces the number of calls to getFont
Jean-Marc> by the two following means:
Jean-Marc> For your enjoyment, I also attach the patch that removes
Jean-Marc> font metrics caching for qt, which I think is also
Jean-Marc> relevant.
The two
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> The following patch reduces the number of calls to getFont
Jean-Marc> by the two following means:
Jean-Marc> For your enjoyment, I also attach the patch that removes
Jean-Marc> font metrics caching for qt, which I th
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| To conclude, can I apply the following patches, or do you want to do
| some testing first?
No, go ahead.
--
Lgb
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Jean-Marc> You mean that code like if (FOO_NOT_AVAILABLE) { // use
>> Jean-Marc> function bar() instead x = bar(); } else { x= foo();
>> Jean-Marc> }
>> Jean-Marc> will compile when foo() does not exist on the system? I a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Jean-Marc> You mean that code like if (FOO_NOT_AVAILABLE) { // use
Jean-Marc> function bar() instead x = bar(); } else { x= foo();
Jean-Marc> }
Jean-Marc> will compile when foo() does not exist on the system? I am
Jean-Marc> surprised.
I see now that the GNU coding
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> No, that is not what I mean. What is mean is that the compiler
Lars> will prune the whole if (false) block from the generated code.
Indeed. And the fact that it will parse the (false) block nevertheless
is nice. But guess it f
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> the you should just leave it as is (+=). a push back buys
| Lars> nothing.
>
| I did that.
>
| |Actually, I do not like it because both branches of the if()
| |will be compil
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> You mean that code like if (FOO_NOT_AVAILABLE) { // use
Jean-Marc> function bar() instead x = bar(); } else { x= foo();
Jean-Marc> }
Jean-Marc> will compile when foo() does not exist on the system? I am
Jean-Marc> s
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> the you should just leave it as is (+=). a push back buys
Lars> nothing.
I did that.
|Actually, I do not like it because both branches of the if()
|will be compiled and in many cases it will not work
|(unavailable function). M
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> I won't with -1 or +1 either :-), you need to check first span
| Lars> either way.
>
| start is initialized to 0, which is the start of the first span.
>
| I changed -1 to +1
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I won't with -1 or +1 either :-), you need to check first span
Lars> either way.
start is initialized to 0, which is the start of the first span.
I changed -1 to +1 in the patch.
| No idea. I left it as it was. I can assert o
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Is the logic in this loop correct? Wont the start positon always
| Lars> just be one smaller than the end pos?
>
| I believe it is correct. It is the logic of the fonttable t
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Is the logic in this loop correct? Wont the start positon always
Lars> just be one smaller than the end pos?
I believe it is correct. It is the logic of the fonttable that is
really twisted. Note however that I did not have an
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Index: src/paragraph.C
| ===
| RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/paragraph.C,v
| retrieving revision 1.405
| diff -u -p -r1.405 paragraph.C
| --- src/paragraph.C 5 May
29 matches
Mail list logo
