RE: [PATCH] improve KDE FormCopyright

2000-08-16 Thread Juergen Vigna
> > Alas current CVS kdevelop seems to have KDE2.0 support only. I'm not > really sure about developing for this target as it's likely to be a year > till its widespread. There doesn't seem to be a intermediate > unfortunately. Yes you're right I won't add code for KDE2 yet too #:O) (I'm testing

RE: [PATCH] improve KDE FormCopyright

2000-08-16 Thread John Levon
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > I'm downloading QT Architect now, this claims to have layout support as > > well as a KDE module. I suppose that might work, but once again, I've no > > idea if internationalisation is possible. > > > > I have QT Architect installed too and used it

RE: [PATCH] improve KDE FormCopyright

2000-08-16 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 16-Aug-2000 John Levon wrote: > > Well personally I don't think it would be quite as bad as that, but I'll > go with your wisdom :) > #:O) > I'm downloading QT Architect now, this claims to have layout support as > well as a KDE module. I suppose that might work, but once again, I've no >

RE: [PATCH] improve KDE FormCopyright

2000-08-16 Thread John Levon
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > > > This also stops using the kdevelop data file. There seems to be no way to > > continue using this and get the geometry management right. Is this OK ? > > (if so, the old formcopyrightdialogdata stuff needs deleting) > > > > To tell you the tr

RE: [PATCH] improve KDE FormCopyright

2000-08-16 Thread Juergen Vigna
> > This also stops using the kdevelop data file. There seems to be no way to > continue using this and get the geometry management right. Is this OK ? > (if so, the old formcopyrightdialogdata stuff needs deleting) > To tell you the truth I don't like this at all! I don't say we should use k