Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-06-09 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Go ahead. Also, please update status.13x accordingly. All done. -- Angus

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-06-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Jean-Marc, I've re-written the Angus> 1.3.x script that performs the conversion of latex file to a Angus> heap of bitmap images in python so that Win32 users have a Angus> chance to use this stuff too. >>

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-06-09 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Jean-Marc, I've re-written the 1.3.x script that performs the > Angus> conversion of latex file to a heap of bitmap images in python > Angus> so that Win32 users have a chance to use this stuff too. > > Angus, you can shove this on in. I'm probably being over-

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-06-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc, I've re-written the 1.3.x script that performs the Angus> conversion of latex file to a heap of bitmap images in python Angus> so that Win32 users have a chance to use this stuff too. Angus, you can shove this on in. JM

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-27 Thread Jose' Matos
On Wednesday 26 May 2004 16:47, Jean-Marc Lassitude's wrote: > > Angus> The python script does all the manipulation using pure python > Angus> code, so it should "just work" if you have python installed. > > Do you think it works with ancient python like 1.5? From what I remember from the code

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Sure, but to make sure that it is set, it might be best to add a Lars> couple of commands to autogen.sh? The situation I am worrying about is people applying a patch from 1.3.4 to 1.3.5. The file will not have executable bit se

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars> Note that it is "make install" that should set the exec bit | Lars> correctly. > | Yes (but having it correct in the distribution does not hurt to run | without install). Su

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How confident are you that it works? Are there differences in what >> they do, or are they equivalent? Angus> They're equivalent. At least that was the aim. Both use latex, Angus> dvips, gs and, optionally, pnmcrop. The shell script us

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Note that it is "make install" that should set the exec bit Lars> correctly. Yes (but having it correct in the distribution does not hurt to run without install). JMarc

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: What would be wrong with setting the execute bit properly? We do that for lyx2lyx, don't we? >> >> Angus> Nothing is wrong with doing that. If we set the executable >> bit, Angus> then the code in LyX itself require

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> What would be wrong with setting the execute bit properly? We do >>> that for lyx2lyx, don't we? > > Angus> Nothing is wrong with doing that. If we set the executable > bit, Angus> then the code in LyX itself requires a trivial change: > > This looks good. > > Rem

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> What would be wrong with setting the execute bit properly? We do >> that for lyx2lyx, don't we? Angus> Nothing is wrong with doing that. If we set the executable bit, Angus> then the code in LyX itsel

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What would be wrong with setting the execute bit properly? We do > that for lyx2lyx, don't we? Nothing is wrong with doing that. If we set the executable bit, then the code in LyX itself requires a trivial change: // The conversion command. ostringstr

Re: Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Thereafter, to ensure that execvp is happy to run the script, Angus> we must either set its executable bit or pass it to the shell. Angus> I chose the latter option. I guess that it'd be easy enough to Angus> check what type of scr

Questions on Instant Preview in 1.3.5

2004-05-26 Thread Angus Leeming
Jean-Marc, I've re-written the 1.3.x script that performs the conversion of latex file to a heap of bitmap images in python so that Win32 users have a chance to use this stuff too. Everything works fine, but I find that I have to use a wrapper script, lyxpreview2bitmap.sh, simply to call the pyth