On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 10:55:08PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> I was joking, but only half. You call
>
> abc \R{DEF \L{{url}} GHI} jkl
>
> the "correct" version. But that's really a matter of taste. It may be
> the version you expected, but the other one is just as correct... only
> the
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 12:45:22AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
...
> >(And out of interest, does the workaround
> >
> >abc \R{[DEF \L{{url}} GHI]} jkl
> >
> >work, with [...] being, e.g., a branch inset?)
> >
>
> Interesting... Yes, it does work. But I don't want to have to do this
> every
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 10:17:37PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:27:33PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
...
Have you tried to change the language around the URL inset (i.e., at the
location of the inset in the external lyxtex
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 10:17:37PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:27:33PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >
> >...
> >
> >>>Have you tried to change the language around the URL inset (i.e., at the
> >>>location of the inset in the external lyxtext
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:27:33PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
...
Have you tried to change the language around the URL inset (i.e., at the
location of the inset in the external lyxtext) to English?
No, this won't work (I mean, it will work, but it's wrong for a
differ
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:27:33PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
...
> >Have you tried to change the language around the URL inset (i.e., at the
> >location of the inset in the external lyxtext) to English?
>
> No, this won't work (I mean, it will work, but it's wrong for a
> different reason)
Martin Vermeer wrote:
To answer my own question, it seems to be LFUN_LANGUAGE.
Does the attached patch allow you to modify language inside a verbatim
inset (but not ERT)?
- Martin
Yes, it does. But nonetheless, it is not correct. First of all, the
output is still "in Hebrew", as there's no
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:42:11PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
> >>> Now, there's also another problem with the URL inset. Currently
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 08:51:33PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> No
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:56:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:11:23PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> > > > Now, there's also anoth
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Now, there's also another problem with the URL inset. Currently, I'm having
..
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Now, there's also another problem with the URL inset. Currently, I'm having
the same problem we were having a few weeks back with the ERT inse
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:56:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
I would not be happy abou
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Now, there's also another problem with the URL inset. Currently, I'm having
the same problem we were having a few weeks back with the ERT insets: if I
try to insert a URL while typing Hebrew text, the font i
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 11:56:51AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >>On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >
...
> >I would not be happy about
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
Martin Vermeer wrote:
There's another consideration which you may already be aware of, but which I
only just found out now, after playi
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 12:02:17PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> > > Now, there's also another problem with the URL inset. Currently, I'm
> > > having
...
> > >
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 09:37:36AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
> >
> >
> > Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > There's another consideration which you may already be aware of, but which
> > I
> > only just found out now, after play
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I have two questions about latex_language:
1)is it true that all it does is prevent the text from being spell
checked (and bluelined)? And
2) is is also true that it differs from ignore_language in that the
latter means that language _changes_ are ignored ... meaning th
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 02:27:25AM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > But then there is an essential difference between ERT and Listing: the
> > content of ERT is executable code, i.e., the rendered document contains
> > its output, not the code itself. An ERT's content
Martin Vermeer wrote:
But then there is an essential difference between ERT and Listing: the
content of ERT is executable code, i.e., the rendered document contains
its output, not the code itself. An ERT's content will never be natural
language. It can safely be forced to latin-1 and needs never
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why was InsetListing derived from InsetERT? I don't think that was a
> good idea.
I think it was because ERT offered feature that Bo wanted. With your
recent refactorization work, it might be less crucial now.
JMarc
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 03:42:07PM +0200, Dov Feldstern wrote:
>
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> >I have two questions about latex_language:
> >
> >1)is it true that all it does is prevent the text from being spell
> >checked (and bluelined)? And
> >
> >2) is is also true that it differs from ignor
Martin Vermeer wrote:
I have two questions about latex_language:
1)is it true that all it does is prevent the text from being spell
checked (and bluelined)? And
2) is is also true that it differs from ignore_language in that the
latter means that language _changes_ are ignored ... meaning th
I have two questions about latex_language:
1)is it true that all it does is prevent the text from being spell
checked (and bluelined)? And
2) is is also true that it differs from ignore_language in that the
latter means that language _changes_ are ignored ... meaning that, if
you have a piece
26 matches
Mail list logo
