yOn Fri, 15 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 01:55:48PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> >
> > > At least, I like the idea of dropping the Form prefix a lot (I never
> > > understood why it was there, probably an xforms thing).
> >
>
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 01:55:48PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
>
> > At least, I like the idea of dropping the Form prefix a lot (I never
> > understood why it was there, probably an xforms thing).
>
> The xforms port was always using Form* for our code
On 14-Jun-2001 John Levon wrote:
> actually I would prefer the .ui files to go in there too.
>
> However your suggestion seems a reasonable compromise. So we are all agreed on :
>
> QTabCreate.[Ch]
> QTabCreate.ui
> QTabCReateDialogImpl.[Ch]
> uic/QTabCreateDialog.[Ch]
Please head that I have
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> At least, I like the idea of dropping the Form prefix a lot (I never
> understood why it was there, probably an xforms thing).
The xforms port was always using Form* for our code and form_* for
generated code. Then other ports started and people ref
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 08:33:54AM +0200, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> Oh, now I see that you want to put the Designer-generated C and h files into
> ui/. Yes, that would be good, especially if the .ui files stay out of there.
> Could be a bit confusing for the casual observer that the .ui files ar
On Thursday 14 June 2001 02:36, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > FormXXX
> > > FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
> > > FormXXXDialogImpl
> >
> > I still hold the opinion that the Form part is redundant. Why not:
> > > XXX
> > > XXXDialog <- m
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > FormXXX
> > FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
> > FormXXXDialogImpl
>
> I still hold the opinion that the Form part is redundant. Why not:
>
> > XXX
> > XXXDialog <- machine generated
> > XXXDialogImpl
>
> On the other 2 point
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:15:11AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 13-Jun-2001 John Levon wrote:
>
> > I would like the .ui files to go in a separate dir as well if possible
> > (even the generated files if possible, so there's a clear distinction between
> > what needs editing via designer,
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 09:14:53AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Having spaces around the condition makes grepping a lot easier IMHO.
>
> Possibly (but only marginally I guess) ... but the rest of LyX does
> not use this.
Kalle, can you explain how it makes grepping easier ?
As I don't
On 13-Jun-2001 John Levon wrote:
> I would like the .ui files to go in a separate dir as well if possible
> (even the generated files if possible, so there's a clear distinction between
> what needs editing via designer, and what needs vimming :)
I did this for my port to KDE2 of KSendFax (not
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > FormXXX
> > FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
> > FormXXXDialogImpl
>
> I still hold the opinion that the Form part is redundant. Why not:
>
> > XXX
> > XXXDialog <- machine generated
> > XXXDialogImpl
Well to make life easier for doxygen (so it can
> FormXXX
> FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
> FormXXXDialogImpl
I still hold the opinion that the Form part is redundant. Why not:
> XXX
> XXXDialog <- machine generated
> XXXDialogImpl
On the other 2 points I am agnostic...
gr.ed.
Kalle Dalheimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Also, a contentious point, but is it possible that we use :
| >
| > if (condition) {
| >
| > rather than
| >
| > if ( condition ) {
| >
| > consistently across the handwritten Qt2 files ? currently it's not even
| > consistent in some sourc
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Edwin said you had settled on :
|
| FormXXX
| FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
| FormXXXDialogImpl
|
| I would really prefer :
|
| FormXXX
| XXXDialog <- machine generated
| XXXDialogImpl
It would also be nice if the qt classes didn't clash too much
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 03:31, John Levon wrote:
> Edwin said you had settled on :
>
> FormXXX
> FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
> FormXXXDialogImpl
>
> I would really prefer :
>
> FormXXX
> XXXDialog <- machine generated
> XXXDialogImpl
>
> because it will be significantly easier to type for
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, John Levon wrote:
[...]
> What do people think on these 3 points ?
Yes.
Allan. (ARRae) The shortest email I ever wrote.
Edwin said you had settled on :
FormXXX
FormXXXDialog <- machine generated
FormXXXDialogImpl
I would really prefer :
FormXXX
XXXDialog <- machine generated
XXXDialogImpl
because it will be significantly easier to type for
things like TabCreate etc.
what do the qt2er's think ?
I would like t
17 matches
Mail list logo
