Re: [immodule-qt] lyx + qt-immodule fixes?

2005-06-22 Thread Mike FABIAN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] さんは書きました: > This has been fixed. You can find the patch in this mailing list. The > fix will eb included in CJK-LyX-1.3.6, of course. Thank you! When do you plan to release CJK-LyX-1.3.6? -- Mike FABIAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.suse.de/~mfabian 睡眠不足はいい仕事の敵だ。

Re: [immodule-qt] lyx + qt-immodule fixes?

2005-06-21 Thread Jose' Matos
; many users are interested this problem being resolved. > > I received several mails from SuSE Linux users because of this problem > as well. Unfortunately I have no idea how to fix it. We have applied a patch in that bug report that seems to fix the problem, but I would like that someone

Re: [immodule-qt] lyx + qt-immodule fixes?

2005-06-21 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Mike FABIAN wrote: > I received several mails from SuSE Linux users because of this problem > as well. Unfortunately I have no idea how to fix it. Hello Mike, the problem has been fixed in 1.3.6cvs and 1.4cvs Regards, Jürgen

Re: [immodule-qt] lyx + qt-immodule fixes?

2005-06-21 Thread Mike FABIAN
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> さんは書きました: > Per your post > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/immodule-qt/2004-December/000649.html > Have you had any chance of looking-at/fixing lyx + qt-immodule? > > FYI, I've filed a bug report in lyx's bugzilla for this

Re: Qt immodule

2005-05-20 Thread Jose' Matos
On Friday 20 May 2005 00:45, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I'm curious. Did they help or did they laugh? :) > Angus I have subscribed the list, and I sent two messages, I got then an automatic message saying that I was not subscribed and messages would need to wait for moderator approval. :-( Si

Re: Qt immodule

2005-05-19 Thread Angus Leeming
Jose' Matos wrote: Incidentally, have you asked in the immodule list about this stuff? (Given that none of us "know anything about this stuff either".) Sure not, real men don't ask questions they jump the cliff. ;-) I have noticed that its mailing has been really quiet lately. I will ask there an

Re: Qt immodule

2005-05-12 Thread Jose' Matos
On Thursday 12 May 2005 13:13, Angus Leeming wrote: > I don't know anything about this stuff either, but looking at the code I > have a couple of questions: > > Given that "*e->text().ascii()" is a char, why do you need the > static_cast ? Surely, C++'s type promotion rules will do that for > you?

Re: Qt immodule

2005-05-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Jose' Matos wrote: > On Monday 09 May 2005 14:33, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> >> As far as I understand, you don't need to handle each single accent, >> that's at least how I read the KOffice fixes (in the recent kotext >> library, see >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/immodule-qt/2004-

Re: Qt immodule

2005-05-12 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 09 May 2005 14:33, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > As far as I understand, you don't need to handle each single accent, > that's at least how I read the KOffice fixes (in the recent kotext > library, see > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/immodule-qt/2004-December/000649.ht >ml I

Re: Qt immodule

2005-05-09 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Angus Leeming wrote: > It might make sense/make your life easier if you posted this question to > the Qt-interest mailing list. See http://lists.trolltech.com They've been > very friendly when answering my questions. Additionally, you might try the qt-immodule list http://lists.f

Re: Qt immodule

2005-05-09 Thread Angus Leeming
Jose' Matos wrote: > On Monday 09 May 2005 11:14, Angus Leeming wrote: >> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: >> > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-users&m=11133296135&w=2 >> > It's from Iñaki García Etxebarria (patch attached). The patch does the >> > correct thing from all that I know [1], but it

Re: Qt immodule

2005-05-09 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 09 May 2005 11:14, Angus Leeming wrote: > Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-users&m=11133296135&w=2 > > It's from Iñaki García Etxebarria (patch attached). The patch does the > > correct thing from all that I know [1], but it only implements > > accen

Re: Qt immodule

2005-05-09 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 09 May 2005 11:14, Angus Leeming wrote: [...] > to: >... > + QKeyEvent ev(QEvent::KeyPress, Qt::Key_AsciiCircum, '^', 0, > + QString("^")); > + keyPressEvent(&ev); Not only that but if the patch is working there is no need for a special handling for

Qt immodule

2005-05-09 Thread Angus Leeming
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: >> Note that someone posted a minimal immodule patch a month or so ago. >> (I'm pretty sure that it was to this list.) Unfortunately, I don't think >> that anyone picked it up, or even said thank you. Even more >> unfortunately, my trawling of the

lyx + qt-immodule fixes?

2005-03-03 Thread Rex Dieter
Kazuki, Per your post http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/immodule-qt/2004-December/000649.html Have you had any chance of looking-at/fixing lyx + qt-immodule? FYI, I've filed a bug report in lyx's bugzilla for this too: http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1830 I ask because I