On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:16:25AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
>
> > On Monday, May 9, 2016 9:46:01 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> >> Georg or José, please feel free to make changes to the RELEASE-NOTES
> >> regarding Python if you think it would make things more clear.
> >>
>
José Matos wrote:
> On Monday, May 9, 2016 9:46:01 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>> Georg or José, please feel free to make changes to the RELEASE-NOTES
>> regarding Python if you think it would make things more clear.
>>
>> Scott
>
> I think that Georg's formulation is clear and more correct t
On Monday, May 9, 2016 9:46:01 PM WEST Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Georg or José, please feel free to make changes to the RELEASE-NOTES
> regarding Python if you think it would make things more clear.
>
> Scott
I think that Georg's formulation is clear and more correct than what we have
now.
Regar
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 05:25:40PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:39:32 AM WEST Georg Baum wrote:
> > I am unsure about building LyX where "python" is python 3. We fixed some
> > build scripts to work both with python 2 and 3, but maybe there are others
> > that don't work
On Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:39:32 AM WEST Georg Baum wrote:
> I am unsure about building LyX where "python" is python 3. We fixed some
> build scripts to work both with python 2 and 3, but maybe there are others
> that don't work with python 3 yet. Assuming that Helge confirms the fix for
> conf
lib/RELEASE-NOTES contains the following paragraph:
* LyX needs to be run under Python 2 and will not work properly on systems
where Python 3 is the default binary. See #7030 to know how to fix this
properly, since simple shebang conversion in *.py files will not be
enough.
I believe that th
