On Tuesday 24 March 2015 10:37:18 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Thanks. I adapted your code and came up with a patch that I pushed to
> master.
Thank you. :-)
> Everything should work now. Please complain if you find a bug.
>
> Note that now configure just dies if no suitable python interpreter
Le 21/03/2015 23:40, José Matos a écrit :
The code attached does this. For the moment I am ignoring the arguments $2 and
$3.
The plan is to have code that supports both versions either 2.7.x (eventually
2.6 if some kind soul tests thoroughly) and 3.3+.
So the code returns 1 if the python vers
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 20:57:43 Kornel Benko wrote:
> Thank you José. If I understood correctly, the opposite of 'open(..,"r")'
> should be 'open(..,"w")'.
> (See development/cmake/po/dos2unix.py:15)
> With also this extra change the script worked too.
>
> Kornel
Note that as you fou
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 15:08:32 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Dear José,
>
> I took a quick look and I need help. The complicated macro for python
> eventually calls:
>
> # AM_PYTHON_CHECK_VERSION(PROG, VERSION, [ACTION-IF-TRUE],
> [ACTION-IF-FALSE])
> #
> -
On Saturday 14 March 2015 14:53:17 Ian Wilder wrote:
> have you guys thought about using Python 2to3?
>
> https://docs.python.org/2/library/2to3.html
>
> even if you don't use the result, it may give a good direction for
> problems that arise.
Bah.. too 2010... ;-)
http://marc.info/?l=lyx-devel
have you guys thought about using Python 2to3?
https://docs.python.org/2/library/2to3.html
even if you don't use the result, it may give a good direction for
problems that arise.
On 2015-02-23 14:54:47 +, José Matos said:
Hi,
the first step to start the procedure is to update the requi
Le 10/03/2015 15:34, José Matos a écrit :
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 15:15:31 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
For autoconf, I saw the message, it is on my virtual todo list.
JMarc
Thank you Jean-Marc. :-)
Dear José,
I took a quick look and I need help. The complicated macro for python
eventuall
Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2015 um 17:57:29, schrieb José Matos
> On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:28:30 Kornel Benko wrote:
> > This is probably trivial, but I could not see the error in dos2unix.py.
> > ...
> > cd /usr/BUILD/BuildLyxGitQt5/po && /usr/bin/python3
> > /usr/src/lyx/lyx-git/development/cma
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 16:28:30 Kornel Benko wrote:
> This is probably trivial, but I could not see the error in dos2unix.py.
> ...
> cd /usr/BUILD/BuildLyxGitQt5/po && /usr/bin/python3
> /usr/src/lyx/lyx-git/development/cmake/po/dos2unix.py
> /usr/BUILD/BuildLyxGitQt5/po/lyx2.2.cat_tmp.pot
>
Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2015 um 13:51:24, schrieb José Matos
> On Tuesday 10 March 2015 18:31:04 Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I've done that. Using python 3.3 is premature anyway, because at least
> > lyx_pot.py does not work.
>
> After the last commit this error does happen anymore but there are othe
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 18:31:04 Kornel Benko wrote:
> I've done that. Using python 3.3 is premature anyway, because at least
> lyx_pot.py does not work.
After the last commit this error does happen anymore but there are others
related with the fact that all strings in python3 are unicode whil
Am Dienstag, 10. März 2015 um 17:13:27, schrieb José Matos
> On Tuesday 10 March 2015 17:18:48 Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I am ready. What should we prefer, 2.7 or 3.3+ ?
> >
> > Kornel
>
> I suggest 2.7 for lyx 2.2 and 3.3+ for later lyx releases.
>
> I suggest python 2 by default for lyx
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 17:18:48 Kornel Benko wrote:
> I am ready. What should we prefer, 2.7 or 3.3+ ?
>
> Kornel
I suggest 2.7 for lyx 2.2 and 3.3+ for later lyx releases.
I suggest python 2 by default for lyx 2.2 because that is where most (all for
now) tests and users are.
Regards
Am Dienstag, 10. März 2015 um 14:11:51, schrieb José Matos
> On Monday 23 February 2015 16:31:27 Kornel Benko wrote:
> > I would take care of it, when it becomes a requirement.
> >
> > Kornel
>
> I have committed the first patch towards this goal.
>
> Because of a mistake (the email was
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 15:15:31 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> For autoconf, I saw the message, it is on my virtual todo list.
>
> JMarc
Thank you Jean-Marc. :-)
--
José Abílio
Le 10/03/2015 15:11, José Matos a écrit :
On Monday 23 February 2015 16:31:27 Kornel Benko wrote:
I would take care of it, when it becomes a requirement.
Kornel
I have committed the first patch towards this goal.
Because of a mistake (the email was unset) it will not show in the com
On Monday 23 February 2015 16:31:27 Kornel Benko wrote:
> I would take care of it, when it becomes a requirement.
>
> Kornel
I have committed the first patch towards this goal.
Because of a mistake (the email was unset) it will not show in the commits
mailing list.
The patch committed
Am Montag, 23. Februar 2015 um 14:54:47, schrieb José Matos
> Hi,
> the first step to start the procedure is to update the requirements for
> python to 2.7 as discussed last year.
>
> My problem is that as described last year I suggest to support python
> == 2.7.x (for any x) and pyt
Hi,
the first step to start the procedure is to update the requirements for
python to 2.7 as discussed last year.
My problem is that as described last year I suggest to support python
== 2.7.x (for any x) and python >= 3.3.0.
I am at loss how to add this test to configur
19 matches
Mail list logo