Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Actually, I plan to apply the following slightly better version.
OK.
Jürgen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jürgen Spitzmüller) writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> But for 1.5 I think my patch is OK, although it can probably use some
>> testing with other classes.
>
> Fine with me.
Actually, I plan to apply the following slightly better version.
JMarc
svndiff lib/layouts/
Ind
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> But for 1.5 I think my patch is OK, although it can probably use some
> testing with other classes.
Fine with me.
Jürgen
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
>> Here is my proposal. Since the style chapter is always suppressed in
>> article, it is not a problem to update it in numarticle (which is not
>> aptly named).
>
> How about renaming it aptly, then?
This is 1.6 stu
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Here is my proposal. Since the style chapter is always suppressed in
> article, it is not a problem to update it in numarticle (which is not
> aptly named).
How about renaming it aptly, then?
Jürgen
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:37:45 +0100
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the problem is that we would like to use .inc files to reduce
> > repeated definition, but we also need to address differences in
> > different .layout files by
> Coping with file inclusion is an _easy_ part of a layout editor.
But how about writing?? If a layout can be defined, and modified in a
number of files, how should the layout editor write further
modification?
> The layout editor can simply read in each included file as
> it happens, building wh
Bo Peng wrote:
I know it's been like that for a while :)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888
I think the problem is that we would like to use .inc files to reduce
repeated definition, but we also need to address differences in
different .layout files by patching these layouts her
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Considering that we may have a layout editor in the not-so-distant
>> future, which will have trouble dealing with all these complexities, I
>> would suggest that we remove inclusion, nostyle etc, and have a single
>> .layout file for every class
"Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the problem is that we would like to use .inc files to reduce
> repeated definition, but we also need to address differences in
> different .layout files by patching these layouts here and there.
>
> Considering that we may have a layout editor in th
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 01:10:32AM -0600, Bo Peng wrote:
> > I know it's been like that for a while :)
> >
> > http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888
>
> I think the problem is that we would like to use .inc files to reduce
> repeated definition, but we also need to address differences in
>
> I know it's been like that for a while :)
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888
I think the problem is that we would like to use .inc files to reduce
repeated definition, but we also need to address differences in
different .layout files by patching these layouts here and there.
Cons
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 11:13 +, Bo Peng wrote:
> Open tutorial, change the layout of the introduction chapter header to
> chapter *, it disappear from Toc (and navigation menu). Anyone knows a
> quick fix?
I know it's been like that for a while :)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3888
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> It seems like a problem of the inclusion order. The attached patch fixes
> the problem for me.
but breaks the section counter :-(
The attached (ugly) double-inclusion seems to do it. Better ideas welcome.
Jürgen
Index: lib/layouts/book.layout
==
Bo Peng wrote:
> The attached patch (against 1.5.x) seems to fix the problem, layout
> experts please confirm.
This looks wrong (numarticle doesn't have chapters, see numreport).
It seems like a problem of the inclusion order. The attached patch fixes the
problem for me.
Jürgen
Index: lib/layo
On Nov 21, 2007 11:13 AM, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Open tutorial, change the layout of the introduction chapter header to
> chapter *, it disappear from Toc (and navigation menu). Anyone knows a
> quick fix?
The attached patch (against 1.5.x) seems to fix the problem, layout
experts p
Open tutorial, change the layout of the introduction chapter header to
chapter *, it disappear from Toc (and navigation menu). Anyone knows a
quick fix?
Bo
17 matches
Mail list logo
