Re: Problem LyX preference window in netbook

2011-05-03 Thread Pavel Sanda
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote: > Dear developers > > I just compile lyx-2.0.0 in my netbook running Ubuntu 10.10. please put it into bugzilla, this wont be fixed in 2.0.0. pavel

Problem LyX preference window in netbook

2011-05-01 Thread Waluyo Adi Siswanto
Dear developers I just compile lyx-2.0.0 in my netbook running Ubuntu 10.10. The problem is related to the LyX: Preferences window: - The height is too high so that I cannot see the buttons at the bottom. The size of the LyX: Document Settings window is ok. therefore my request is to make the hei

Re: Problem LyX Version Control

2010-11-13 Thread Pavel Sanda
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote: > Pavel, one more question: > why you are asking "didn't you commit for example from a different box > before?" if you commit from another box1, you must first checkout in box2 before committing from box2, thats all... with the gnome-keyring i have no experience, but

Re: Problem LyX Version Control

2010-11-13 Thread Waluyo Adi Siswanto
On 13 November 2010 19:42, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote: >> >> there can be many different problems what's wrong. the best is to go to >> console, >> and try to commit from there and look what will happen. >> didn't you commit for example from a different box before? >> > > Yes, the first I found th

Re: Problem LyX Version Control

2010-11-13 Thread Waluyo Adi Siswanto
> > there can be many different problems what's wrong. the best is to go to > console, > and try to commit from there and look what will happen. > didn't you commit for example from a different box before? > Yes, the first I found the problem was from Windows machine, I thought LyX version contro

Re: Problem LyX Version Control

2010-11-13 Thread Pavel Sanda
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote: > The typical message that appeared is attached. I keep on trying but always > fail. > > For your info, I can checkin from PySVN Workbench (Ubuntu 10.04). > > Is this lyx problem, how to fix this problem? there can be many different problems what's wrong. the best is

Problem LyX Version Control

2010-11-13 Thread Waluyo Adi Siswanto
I have encountered a problem in using LyX version control (Check in changes). I did many times previously to directly checkin changes (from within LyX 1.6.7) to my lyx project in googlecode SVN repository. Since yesterday It does not work any more. Other submenus (checkout, update, revert, show

Re: Problem LyX

2007-02-24 Thread Paul A. Rubin
Oliver Simmank wrote: just for shure - my request in english (hope its not too bad..) my problem is that everytime I press the arrow keys, or insert key or mostly any function key, LyX only creates the character "^" and does not move the cursor as desired. I'm using LyX 1.4.4 under windows X

Problem LyX

2007-02-22 Thread Oliver Simmank
just for shure - my request in english (hope its not too bad..) my problem is that everytime I press the arrow keys, or insert key or mostly any function key, LyX only creates the character "^" and does not move the cursor as desired. I'm using LyX 1.4.4 under windows XP. is this a known pro

Problem LyX

2007-02-22 Thread Oliver Simmank
Hallo! Ich habe bei meinem Praktikum in einer Firma Lyx für Dokumentationen schätzen gelernt. Nun wollte ich einen Beleg für die Uni zuhause schreiben, und stelle immer einen Fehler fest: Bei jeglicher Benutzung der Pfeiltasten erscheinen nur "^", statt dass der Cursor sich bewegt. auch die Lösc

Re: [Patch] Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-06-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> ...and remembered status.14x Good man. JMarc

Re: [Patch] Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-06-09 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 17:39 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> So, I believe I understand the problem. But how to fix it? > > Martin> I believe I know that too: noFontChange(). The attached fixes > Martin> the reported bug. I'l

Re: [Patch] Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-06-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So, I believe I understand the problem. But how to fix it? Martin> I believe I know that too: noFontChange(). The attached fixes Martin> the reported bug. I'll commit it soon to 1.5 and 1.4 if I hear Martin> no objection. Martin> +

Re: [Patch] Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-06-03 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 3. Juni 2006 17:32 schrieb Martin Vermeer: > I believe I know that too: noFontChange(). The attached fixes the reported > bug. I'll commit it soon to 1.5 and 1.4 if I hear no objection. That looks OK since insetminipage did also return true in noFontChange() (but I think the 1.4 patc

[Patch] Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-06-03 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 04:38:42PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote: > On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:32:12PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: ... > When Latexing the document from LyX 1.3, I get > > \begin{center}\textit{\scriptsize }\begin{minipage}[c]{0.8\columnwidth}% > {\large For there is ... establish the

Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-06-03 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:32:12PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2006 23:38 schrieb Martin Vermeer: > > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:25:18PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > > I did that, and it is a box problem. Please file it in bugzilla. > Martin, do > > > you have an idea? > > >

Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-06-03 Thread Georg Baum
Am Donnerstag, 1. Juni 2006 23:38 schrieb Martin Vermeer: > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:25:18PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > I did that, and it is a box problem. Please file it in bugzilla. Martin, do > > you have an idea? > > No... what does the LaTeX look like? Just export the minimal example I

Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-06-01 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:25:18PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Ekkehart Schlicht wrote: > > > Some expert may recognize the issue right away. Otherwise I shall try to > > to produce a minimal example > > I did that, and it is a box problem. Please file it in bugzilla. Martin, do > you have an idea

Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-05-31 Thread Georg Baum
Ekkehart Schlicht wrote: > Some expert may recognize the issue right away. Otherwise I shall try to > to produce a minimal example I did that, and it is a box problem. Please file it in bugzilla. Martin, do you have an idea? Georg paris2.lyx Description: application/lyx

Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn - reduced example

2006-05-31 Thread Ekkehart Schlicht
Jean-Marc: I checked again. The problem seems to relate to the minipage at the beginning of the example file. If I delete it, the error is gone. Included not a minimal, but a reduced example that shows exactly the same error messages with Lyx 1.4.2svn Ekkehart paris-reduced.lyx Descripti

Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-05-31 Thread Ekkehart Schlicht
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Ekkehart" == Ekkehart Schlicht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ekkehart> Hi, now that the navigation problem (bug 2460) is mended, I Ekkehart> am happy to switch to the new version. My first impression Ekkehart> is very good. Ekkehart> My fist suspected bug is this one

Re: compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-05-31 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Ekkehart" == Ekkehart Schlicht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ekkehart> Hi, now that the navigation problem (bug 2460) is mended, I Ekkehart> am happy to switch to the new version. My first impression Ekkehart> is very good. Ekkehart> My fist suspected bug is this one: The attached file has E

compatibility problem lyx 137 - lyx 142svn

2006-05-31 Thread Ekkehart Schlicht
Hi, now that the navigation problem (bug 2460) is mended, I am happy to switch to the new version. My first impression is very good. My fist suspected bug is this one: The attached file has been created by Lyx 137 and compiles fine with pdflatex, but this does not work with lyx 142svn. If I e

Re: [REPOSTED: Compile/link problem (lyx-1.5.0svn)]

2006-03-24 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > My automated builds are still not happening. The link is failing > with "multiple definition of (anonymous namespace)..." messages. This is a bug in gcc 4.0.2 and some 4.0.3 pre versions. Already discussed extensively on this list. Jürgen

[REPOSTED: Compile/link problem (lyx-1.5.0svn)]

2006-03-24 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
- Forwarded message from "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - From: "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: LyX Developers Subject: Compile/link problem (lyx-1.5.0svn) My automated builds are still not happening. The link is failing with &q

Compile/link problem (lyx-1.5.0svn)

2006-03-22 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
My automated builds are still not happening. The link is failing with "multiple definition of (anonymous namespace)..." messages. Here are some representative messages. > === Building QT LyX === > [...] > > Configuration > Host type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > Special bu

Re: Help needed: autogen.sh problem - LyX 1.2.2cvs fails with SuSE8.1

2002-10-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > | | "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 06.10.2002, 18:27:34: >> >>> This comes from all of the unused, unsupported, unnecessary, and buggy, >>> qt, gtk, gnome crud in autogen.sh etc. --- talk to Jean Marc.

Re: Help needed: autogen.sh problem - LyX 1.2.2cvs fails with SuSE8.1

2002-10-07 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | "Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 06.10.2002, 18:27:34: > >> This comes from all of the unused, unsupported, unnecessary, and buggy, >> qt, gtk, gnome crud in autogen.sh etc. --- talk to Jean Marc. > | I found out that it is sufficient to do the following

Re: Help needed: autogen.sh problem - LyX 1.2.2cvs fails with SuSE 8.1

2002-10-07 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Garst> This comes from all of the unused, unsupported, unnecessary, Garst> and buggy, qt, gtk, gnome crud in autogen.sh etc. --- talk to Garst> Jean Marc. This comes mostly from the fact that the configure scripts of 1.2.x have not been

Re: Re: Help needed: autogen.sh problem - LyX 1.2.2cvs fails with SuSE 8.1

2002-10-06 Thread michael . schmitt
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am 06.10.2002, 18:27:34: > This comes from all of the unused, unsupported, unnecessary, and buggy, > qt, gtk, gnome crud in autogen.sh etc. --- talk to Jean Marc. I found out that it is sufficient to do the following: In file aclocal.m4: line 8

Re: Help needed: autogen.sh problem - LyX 1.2.2cvs fails with SuSE 8.1

2002-10-06 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 01:27:34PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > This comes from all of the unused, unsupported, unnecessary, and buggy, > qt, gtk, gnome crud in autogen.sh etc. --- talk to Jean Marc. Where is your evidence for this. Michael did not provide enough info to decide. john -- "I

Re: Help needed: autogen.sh problem - LyX 1.2.2cvs fails with SuSE 8.1

2002-10-06 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sunday 06 October 2002 15:59, Kornel Benko wrote: > P.S. > it may be sufficient to uncomment the lines #68 to #73 in configure.in Here I meant "comment". Sorry. Kornel - -- Kornel Benko [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6

Re: Help needed: autogen.sh problem - LyX 1.2.2cvs fails with SuSE 8.1

2002-10-06 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sunday 06 October 2002 15:59, Kornel Benko wrote: > aclocal > ./autogen.sh > rm -f I meant "rm -f config.status" Kornel - -- Kornel Benko [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGP 6.5.8 iQCVAwUBPaBSR7ewfb

Re: Help needed: autogen.sh problem - LyX 1.2.2cvs fails with SuSE 8.1

2002-10-06 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sunday 06 October 2002 10:35, Michael Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > after upgrading to SuSE 8.1, I intended to recompile a fresh copy of > LyX. But unfortunately, autogen.sh already generated a large list of > warnings. Afterwards, configure fail due to a missing

Help needed: autogen.sh problem - LyX 1.2.2cvs fails with SuSE 8.1

2002-10-06 Thread Michael Schmitt
Hi, after upgrading to SuSE 8.1, I intended to recompile a fresh copy of LyX. But unfortunately, autogen.sh already generated a large list of warnings. Afterwards, configure fail due to a missing symbol/variable (I can't send you the output but I guess you already know the problem). SuSE 8.1.

Re: compilation problem (lyx v.1.0.2pre1): insetbib.C

1999-04-09 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Jan" == Jan van der Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jan> I just downloaded and compiled Lyx for my Solaris 2.5.1 Jan> box. There was a compilation error (I'm using egcs-1.0.3) for Jan> file insetbib.C: Jan> g++ -c -g -O2 -I. -I. -I../images -I/usr/openwin/include Jan> insetbib.C insetbib.

compilation problem (lyx v.1.0.2pre1): insetbib.C

1999-04-09 Thread Jan van der Lee
I just downloaded and compiled Lyx for my Solaris 2.5.1 box. There was a compilation error (I'm using egcs-1.0.3) for file insetbib.C: g++ -c -g -O2 -I. -I. -I../images -I/usr/openwin/include insetbib.C insetbib.C: In method `class LString InsetBibtex::getKeys()': insetbib.C:403: base operand