Jose' Matos wrote:
>> > This can be done earlier in the candidates stage, but you get
>> > the
>> > idea. :-)
>>
>> Sorry, I don't follow.
>
> Conceptually is the program name that is different, so this
> functions does
> not need to changed if you replace only the candidate list depending
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 10:00, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > This can be done earlier in the candidates stage, but you get the
> > idea. :-)
>
> Sorry, I don't follow.
Conceptually is the program name that is different, so this functions does
not need to changed if you replace only the candidat
Jose' Matos wrote:
> Roughly the code should look like this:
> if os.name == "nt":
> full_path = os.path.join(directory, prog + ".exe")
> else:
> full_path = os.path.join(directory, prog)
Thank you.
> This can be done earlier in the candidates stage, but you get the
> idea. :-)
Sorry, I don't
On Wednesday 19 May 2004 09:05, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Jose,
>
> def find_exe(candidates, path):
> for prog in candidates:
> for directory in path:
> - full_path = os.path.join(directory, prog)
> + full_path = os.path.join(directory, prog
Jose,
I've been getting Paul Rubin to test a python version of the "instant
preview for lyx 1.3.x" script. Win32 users currently don't have
access to this eye candy, mainly because so many unix utilities need
to be installed first and, crucially, all these utilities need to
work. Amazing how m
