Pavel Sanda wrote:
hi,
is there some reason why we have "PlainLayout" instead of "Plain Layout"?
if not i will commit the attached (Richard, please look that it makes sense).
If it works, it's fine with me.
rh
> hi,
>
> is there some reason why we have "PlainLayout" instead of "Plain Layout"?
if not i will commit the attached (Richard, please look that it makes sense).
pavel
diff --git a/src/TextClass.cpp b/src/TextClass.cpp
index da80c56..3c2afbc 100644
---
hi,
is there some reason why we have "PlainLayout" instead of "Plain Layout"
pavel
hat
\end_layout
\end_inset
which is now invalid, because ERT uses only PlainLayout. So one
possibility would be to write some lyx2lyx that would deal with this
conversion. And maybe that's the way to go, though that might be
complicated, since one would have to convert the layouts only inside
cert
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe, Richard,
Whenever I set the cursor inside a caption or an index, I get this
message: "Trying to select non existent layout type Standard".
This is from my recent fix for the big layout bug. I'll sort it out
later today.
rh
Uwe, Richard,
Whenever I set the cursor inside a caption or an index, I get this
message: "Trying to select non existent layout type Standard".
Please have a look.
Abdel.
