Quoting Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> So is the suggestion that I should make the check with #if? If so, can
> someone remind me how to do this? I.e, what the QT_VERSION syntax is?
http://doc.trolltech.com/4.1/qtglobal.html#QT_VERSION
#if QT_VERSION == 0x040203
...
#endif
So is the suggestion that I should make the check with #if? If so, can
someone remind me how to do this? I.e, what the QT_VERSION syntax is?
Richard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>> "younes" == younes a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Quoting Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "younes" == younes a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> There are many places where we assume that we know it. I would not
> >> care about that unless there appears to be a real need. Currently
> >> we distribute qt with LyX in windows and
> "younes" == younes a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> There are many places where we assume that we know it. I would not
>> care about that unless there appears to be a real need. Currently
>> we distribute qt with LyX in windows and OS X, and linux uses the
>> system Qt, which is not suppose
Quoting Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Or maybe better: Is there any way to check if we're running
> > under 4.2.3,
> >
> I think you can use this : #if QT_VERSION == 0x040203 ... #endif
>
> Richar
> "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Or maybe better: Is there any way to check if we're running
> under 4.2.3,
>
I think you can use this : #if QT_VERSION == 0x040203 ... #endif
Richard> But I think it needs to be a run-time check...
>> Why a run-
Or maybe better: Is there any way to check if we're running under
4.2.3,
>>> I think you can use this : #if QT_VERSION == 0x040203 ... #endif
>>>
> Richard> But I think it needs to be a run-time check...
>
> Why a run-time check?
>
Because if we're compiling a bin
> "Richard" == Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Richard> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> Richard Heck wrote:
>>> Or maybe better: Is there any way to check if we're running under
>>> 4.2.3,
>> I think you can use this : #if QT_VERSION == 0x040203 ... #endif
Richard> But I think it needs to
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:59:36PM -0400, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> The attached patch resolves bug 3381. I am not so much suggesting it at
> this point as just asking about it. It needs to be tested on a variety
> of systems, in particular with different versions of QT4, before any
> further action
Richard Heck wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
Or maybe better: Is there any way to check if we're running under 4.2.3,
I think you can use this :
#if QT_VERSION == 0x040203
...
#endif
But I think it needs to be a run-time check...
In :
const char * qVersion ()
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>> Or maybe better: Is there any way to check if we're running under 4.2.3,
> I think you can use this :
> #if QT_VERSION == 0x040203
> ...
> #endif
But I think it needs to be a run-time check...
rh
--
===
Richard Heck wrote:
The attached patch resolves bug 3381. I am not so much suggesting it at
this point as just asking about it. It needs to be tested on a variety
of systems, in particular with different versions of QT4, before any
further action can be taken. I've posted a message to Trolltech t
The attached patch resolves bug 3381. I am not so much suggesting it at
this point as just asking about it. It needs to be tested on a variety
of systems, in particular with different versions of QT4, before any
further action can be taken. I've posted a message to Trolltech telling
them about thi
13 matches
Mail list logo