John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:32:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > Ah, that stupid qt thingie...
|
| ??
|
| > should just be changed to put something in the error string. Just let
| > the configure go through, but with a huge Error/Warning messag
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:32:25PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Ah, that stupid qt thingie...
??
> should just be changed to put something in the error string. Just let
> the configure go through, but with a huge Error/Warning message at the
> bottom when finished.
Why oh why ? The user
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:15:17PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
|
| > | Can't we please error out earlier Lars ?
| >
| > Sure why not...
| >
| > (ah you want me to do this as well... then I need a better problem
| > description.)
|
| It's quite sim
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:15:17PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | Can't we please error out earlier Lars ?
>
> Sure why not...
>
> (ah you want me to do this as well... then I need a better problem
> description.)
It's quite simple, you changed it to be FATAL=0 so now a
--with-frontend=q
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Can't we please error out earlier Lars ?
Sure why not...
(ah you want me to do this as well... then I need a better problem
description.)
--
Lgb
Can't we please error out earlier Lars ?
Currently we storm right on after a bad setup, and end up with some
obscure error when compiling. In 1.3, the error is flagged at configure
time correctly
john
