Re: Paragraph indendation

2005-01-17 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Probably... is this already on bugzilla? No. I'll file bugs on all these cases to you. > >> I cannot work on this until I get a house & adsl (hopefully in some > >> weeks), but I can try to give some other puny advice every now and then > >> ;-) > > > > To be honest, I

Re: Paragraph indendation

2005-01-17 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Alfredo Braunstein wrote: >> Paragraph::ownerCode() seems to refer to the insettext owner, not to the >> tabular owner and this explains why we cannot currently distinguish >> between normal text and text in tabulars. > > Ah, I suspected something like this. Is it po

Re: Paragraph indendation

2005-01-17 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Paragraph::ownerCode() seems to refer to the insettext owner, not to the > tabular owner and this explains why we cannot currently distinguish between > normal text and text in tabulars. Ah, I suspected something like this. Is it possible that this lack of distinguishi

Re: Paragraph indendation

2005-01-17 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > I am trying to fix the broken paragraph indendation (i.e., its > representation on screen). So far, I have spotted the line to blame. It's > the check for InsetBase::TEXT_CODE in the following snippet (text.C, > 598ff): > > if (pos = 0

Paragraph indendation

2005-01-17 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
I am trying to fix the broken paragraph indendation (i.e., its representation on screen). So far, I have spotted the line to blame. It's the check for InsetBase::TEXT_CODE in the following snippet (text.C, 598ff): if (pos = 0 [...] // in charstyles, tabulars an