Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW schrieb:
rgheck schrieb:
Matthias Coy wrote:
rgheck schrieb:
Matthias Coy wrote:
Hi,
I'm using 1.6.0RC3 on Windows, and the generation of PDF is working
fine. Only the "abstract", which is shown fine in Lyx has no
headline on the pdf-output itself. This is st
rgheck schrieb:
> Matthias Coy wrote:
>> rgheck schrieb:
>>> Matthias Coy wrote:
Hi,
I'm using 1.6.0RC3 on Windows, and the generation of PDF is working
fine. Only the "abstract", which is shown fine in Lyx has no
headline on the pdf-output itself. This is strange, becau
rgheck schrieb:
Matthias Coy wrote:
rgheck schrieb:
Matthias Coy wrote:
Hi,
I'm using 1.6.0RC3 on Windows, and the generation of PDF is working
fine. Only the "abstract", which is shown fine in Lyx has no
headline on the pdf-output itself. This is strange, because I would
like to habe the
Matthias Coy wrote:
rgheck schrieb:
Matthias Coy wrote:
Hi,
I'm using 1.6.0RC3 on Windows, and the generation of PDF is working
fine. Only the "abstract", which is shown fine in Lyx has no
headline on the pdf-output itself. This is strange, because I would
like to habe the "Abscract" title
rgheck schrieb:
Matthias Coy wrote:
Hi,
I'm using 1.6.0RC3 on Windows, and the generation of PDF is working
fine. Only the "abstract", which is shown fine in Lyx has no headline
on the pdf-output itself. This is strange, because I would like to
habe the "Abscract" title on my PDF as well.
Matthias Coy wrote:
Hi,
I'm using 1.6.0RC3 on Windows, and the generation of PDF is working
fine. Only the "abstract", which is shown fine in Lyx has no headline
on the pdf-output itself. This is strange, because I would like to
habe the "Abscract" title on my PDF as well.
Any suggestions
Hi,
I'm using 1.6.0RC3 on Windows, and the generation of PDF is working
fine. Only the "abstract", which is shown fine in Lyx has no headline on
the pdf-output itself. This is strange, because I would like to habe
the "Abscract" title on my PDF as well.
Any suggestions why this is happening
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's already code in the script to test whether ps2pdf13 exists. That
> code should be extended to test whether the ps2pdf version that's used
> actually works with pdflatex.
>
> Something like:
>
>
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
Using the pdflatex in teTeX 2.0 to compile the following:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\begin{document}
\includegraphics{test.pdf}
\end{document}
where test.pdf is version 1.5, gives the following error:
Error: pdflatex (file test.pdf): pdf inclusion:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> That means when we want to support teTeX 1.x we need to go down to
> ps2pdf12 or we could directly upgrade to ps2pdf14. teTeX 2.0 was
> released on 20/01/2003 so it is possible that somebody is still using
> teTeX 1.x.
IMO we can ignore teTeX 1.x. We never had any complaint, an
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That means when we want to support teTeX 1.x we need to go down to
> ps2pdf12 or we could directly upgrade to ps2pdf14. teTeX 2.0 was
> released on 20/01/2003 so it is possible that somebody is still using
> teTeX 1.x. I don't know if PDF 1.2 makes troubl
Enrico Forestieri writes:
tetex 1.x supports PDF1.3 while tetex 2.x supports PDF1.4.
I am not sure that no one uses tetex 1.x anymore.
Sorry, my mistake: tetex 1.x supports PDF1.2
That means when we want to support teTeX 1.x we need to go down to
ps2pdf12 or we could directly upgrade to ps2
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> tetex 1.x supports PDF1.3 while tetex 2.x supports PDF1.4.
> I am not sure that no one uses tetex 1.x anymore.
Sorry, my mistake: tetex 1.x supports PDF1.2
Enrico
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> pdftex older than version 1.3 produces PDF1.4 so that the user gets a
> consistent PDF. (If the image is included as PDF1.3 it is internally
> converted which might take some extra time).
> As far as I know is the change between PDF1.4 and PDF1.5 much big
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Uwe> (Besides this, what is the reason that we use ps2pdf13 instead of
Uwe> ps2pdf14? pdf14 is used by Acroread 5 and later and I don't think
Uwe> that anybody uses acroread 4 that was released in June 1999.)
What do we gain?
pdftex older than version 1.3 produces
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> (Besides this, what is the reason that we use ps2pdf13 instead of
Uwe> ps2pdf14? pdf14 is used by Acroread 5 and later and I don't think
Uwe> that anybody uses acroread 4 that was released in June 1999.)
What do we gain?
> "Uwe" == Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Uwe> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
>> Hmm, it seems from here
>> http://casper.ghostscript.com/~ghostgum/pdftips.htm that this
>> syntax may not work with windows...
Uwe> Yes one has to use the "#" char instead of the "=". Isn't it
Uwe> possible
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
Hmm, it seems from here
http://casper.ghostscript.com/~ghostgum/pdftips.htm
that this syntax may not work with windows...
Yes one has to use the "#" char instead of the "=". Isn't it possible to
have a Win-subbranch to cover such specialities?
thanks for the h
Angus Leeming wrote:
If the solution is simply to define a converter as
ps2pdf13 -dAutoRotatePages=/None $$i
then I think that we should do it, no?
This is indeed the solution and we should set this option.
(Besides this, what is the reason that we use ps2pdf13 instead of
ps2pdf14? pdf1
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Guys, I just wanted to draw your attention to this message on
Angus> the lyx-users list:
Angus> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/26064
Angus> IIRC correctly, we have had problems throughout the ages with
Angus>
Guys,
I just wanted to draw your attention to this message on the lyx-users
list:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/26064
IIRC correctly, we have had problems throughout the ages with files
converted to pdf by different routes (latex->dvi->ps->pdf, pdflatex)
producing differen
21 matches
Mail list logo
