Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>| Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
>>| have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
>>| if you tried it it's ok for me or should I try it out
On 02-May-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
>| have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
>| if you tried it it's ok for me or should I try it out too?
>
> It did the same thing as yours + moved
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> well... then Jürgens patch will not apply.
>
| Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
| have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
| if you tried
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> well... then Jürgens patch will not apply.
Lars I already commited my patch so my patch is already in and doesn't
have to apply anymore. I didn't have a look at the patch from Dekel but
if you tried it it's ok for me or should I try it out too?
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:59:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:18:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> | When I read it, the text in the latex layout is not inserte
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:59:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:18:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> | When I read it, the text in the latex layout is not inserted into ERT inset.
> >> | Looking at the code,
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:18:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | When I read it, the text in the latex layout is not inserted into ERT inset.
>> | Looking at the code, I see that by the time we reach the line
>> | if (compare_no_case(layoutname,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 03:18:34PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | When I read it, the text in the latex layout is not inserted into ERT inset.
> | Looking at the code, I see that by the time we reach the line
> | if (compare_no_case(layoutname, "latex") == 0)
> | the layout was already ch
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 11:56:07AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>>
>> On 29-Apr-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> Why do you say that 1.2.0cvs is not able to read files with the latex
>>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 11:56:07AM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 29-Apr-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Why do you say that 1.2.0cvs is not able to read files with the latex
> >> layout? Hmm it seems that we test for a vali
On 30-Apr-2002 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And this is a different bug from the one I answered to, right?
Nope! I copied it from your reply to this patch!
> Anyway I think your patch looks ok.
I'll commit this one then!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 29-Apr-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> Why do you say that 1.2.0cvs is not able to read files with the latex
>>> layout? Hmm it seems that we test for a valid layout a bit early in
>>
On 29-Apr-2002 Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Why do you say that 1.2.0cvs is not able to read files with the latex
>> layout? Hmm it seems that we test for a valid layout a bit early in
>> buffer.C... so that the compability reading do
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:31:16PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I'd like some one to test this before it is applied.
>
> What are a relevant test file?
There's a testcase in the bug !
Hold on and I'll run through all the list's patches (if Jug would care
to send the missing one ...)
jo
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The last one for today have a look!
I'd like some one to test this before it is applied.
What are a relevant test file?
| Jug
>
| --
| -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
| Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 06:01:27PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Why do you say that 1.2.0cvs is not able to read files with the latex
> layout? Hmm it seems that we test for a valid layout a bit early in
> buffer.C... so that the compability reading does not kick in before we
> have already
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:23:32PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>> The last one for today have a look!
>
| It doesn't appear as a correct fix to me.
>
| Note that the example file does not work as lyx 1.2.0cvs
| cannot read 1.1.6 files which use the latex l
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 05:23:32PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> The last one for today have a look!
It doesn't appear as a correct fix to me.
Note that the example file does not work as lyx 1.2.0cvs
cannot read 1.1.6 files which use the latex layout, which is, again, very bad
(is this bug in bu
The last one for today have a look!
Jug
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
19 matches
Mail list logo
