On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
> 2) Slightly distantly related to this:
>Is there a plan to include right-mouse-click-contex-sensitive
>menus? (Does XForms allow this technique?)
We need to be careful with these. Remember it's a shootable UI design
offence to have something availa
> "Allan" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Allan> Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way they are.
Allan> Maybe we really need to start looking at the layout abstraction
Allan> idea we've discussed before. Such that LyX knows what styles
Allan> are of similar types¹ -- secti
> "R" == R Lahaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> 1) What if the layout list would be user-configurable, like the
R> menu bar is at present? Ship LyX with a default layout list, but
R> let the user define his/her own when desired.
What do you mean? You can define your own styles already. If y
Allan Rae wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
> > I would suggest to have the layout list ordered alphabetically;
> > maybe "Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better
> > organized if it was in alphabetical order.
>
> Yuck. Sorry but I like the classes I use the way
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, R. Lahaye wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...)
> is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the
> item I need.
In the classes I've converted to layouts I've tried to organize the
entries by type/class eg. sectio
Hi,
The layout list in the toolbar (Standard, Itemize, Numerize ...)
is getting longer and longer. I'm continuesly searching for the
item I need.
I would suggest to have the list ordered alphabetically; maybe
"Standard" can stay at the top, but the rest would be better
organized if it was in al
