On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 12:14:28AM +0100, Christian Ridderstr?m wrote:
> This problem was reported earlier and I've "confirmed" it.
>
> I don't know if it's a lyx-bug or a latex-bug, here's the rundown:
>
> This file works: http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/bugs/option-clash/works.lyx
>
> This file
On 14 Feb 2003, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Christian> So... is this a lyx bug that I should report or?
>
> Please open a bug. The solution might be as simple as putting the
> dvips option in documentclass, as you did.
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Christian Ridderström wrote:
>
> I guess that the real test is to export the file to latex and see if it
> still dies when you move the \usepackage{graphicx} macro above the
> \usepackage{rotate}. If this is the fix to the problem, then we can fix Ly
> "Christian" == Christian Ridderström <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Christian> so that explains why it tries to call graphicx with [dvips]
Christian> the second time. The reason (I think) that grpahicx has
Christian> already been called is that the document contains a table
Christian> cell with
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> This problem was reported earlier and I've "confirmed" it.
>
> I don't know if it's a lyx-bug or a latex-bug, here's the rundown:
>
> This file works: http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/bugs/option-clash/works.lyx
>
> This file fails: http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/bug
This problem was reported earlier and I've "confirmed" it.
I don't know if it's a lyx-bug or a latex-bug, here's the rundown:
This file works: http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/bugs/option-clash/works.lyx
This file fails: http://www.md.kth.se/~chr/lyx/bugs/option-clash/fails.lyx
With the error that
