On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 12:44:47PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Can we not reconcile the two by having a LyXText::dispatch, but move
> lfunAppendix out of LyXText. Ie, it becomes a function that takes a LyXText
> argument. You could shove this new function into text_funcs.[Ch].
The function c
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:09:22PM +0200, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> So you really think inserting something in a LyXText should be handled by
> the BufferView?
Btw: the patch changes the originally public toggleAppendix into a
private lfunAppendix. So this looks like better encapsulation that is n
On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 02:00:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | I'd like to move "text related stuff" from BufferView to LyXText.
> | Attached patch creates a dispatch() for LyXText and moves the handling of
> | LFUN_APPENDIX to LyXText.
> >
On Monday 19 August 2002 1:00 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | I'd like to move "text related stuff" from BufferView to LyXText.
> | Attached patch creates a dispatch() for LyXText and moves the handling of
> | LFUN_APPENDIX to LyXText.
> |
> | Good/ba
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I'd like to move "text related stuff" from BufferView to LyXText.
| Attached patch creates a dispatch() for LyXText and moves the handling of
| LFUN_APPENDIX to LyXText.
>
| Good/bad idea? Other comments?
I am working/aiming to make LyXText _a lot_ sm
I'd like to move "text related stuff" from BufferView to LyXText.
Attached patch creates a dispatch() for LyXText and moves the handling of
LFUN_APPENDIX to LyXText.
Good/bad idea? Other comments?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do