On Thursday 20 February 2003 4:02 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:54:38PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > >> virtual string const Inset::stringForDialog() const
> > >> method perhaps.
> > >
> > > don't we already have names for the insets ?
> >
> > You mean
> > cl
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:54:38PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> virtual string const Inset::stringForDialog() const
> >> method perhaps.
> >
> > don't we already have names for the insets ?
>
> You mean
> class Inset {
> string const name_;
> };
> ? I
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:45:29PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> The Dialogs class can work out who to call from the 'name' but we need to
>> fill 'data' appropriately. Either use a switch or have a new
>> virtual string const Inset::stringForDialog() const
>> metho
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:45:29PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> The Dialogs class can work out who to call from the 'name' but we need to
> fill 'data' appropriately. Either use a switch or have a new
> virtual string const Inset::stringForDialog() const
> method perhaps.
don't we alre
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:27:34PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> You need an LFUN_SHOW_DIALOG_NEXT that finds the desired inset and then
>> opens the dialog. You could either call Dialogs::show direct as:
>> owner->getDialogs().show(name, data, inset);
>> where 'dat
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 01:27:34PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> You need an LFUN_SHOW_DIALOG_NEXT that finds the desired inset and then
> opens the dialog. You could either call Dialogs::show direct as:
> owner->getDialogs().show(name, data, inset);
> where 'data' is a string of the stuf
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:59:32PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> > Since you're working in this stuff, can you bear in mind the mooted
>> > "edit-properties" ? It would be nice if this was worked into your new
>> > framework.
>>
>> Care to remind me what it is?
>
> Sorry
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 12:59:32PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Since you're working in this stuff, can you bear in mind the mooted
> > "edit-properties" ? It would be nice if this was worked into your new
> > framework.
>
> Care to remind me what it is?
Sorry. We want a generic ability to b
John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:46:29AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
>> This is the code for LFUN_CITATION_CREATE as I have it in my tree:
>> case LFUN_CITATION_CREATE:
>
> Since you're working in this stuff, can you bear in mind the mooted
> "edit-properties" ? It would
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:46:29AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> This is the code for LFUN_CITATION_CREATE as I have it in my tree:
> case LFUN_CITATION_CREATE:
Since you're working in this stuff, can you bear in mind the mooted
"edit-properties" ? It would be nice if this was worked int
This is the code for LFUN_CITATION_CREATE as I have it in my tree:
case LFUN_CITATION_CREATE:
{
InsetCommandParams p("cite");
if (!argument.empty()) {
// This should be set at source, ie when typing
//
11 matches
Mail list logo
