Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Yes, we should not use the print form when exporting at all, that is a
| > hack. I got a patch that did the export stuff correct, but I had some
| > comments to that patch and asked that it be corrected before I'd
| > commit it... this was never done.
> Yes, we should not use the print form when exporting at all, that is a
> hack. I got a patch that did the export stuff correct, but I had some
> comments to that patch and asked that it be corrected before I'd
> commit it... this was never done.
> (not long ago 1month?)
>
> Lgb
Can you g
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I'm attempting to move the print dialog over to the SigC++
| stuff. My interest is in the print form, rather than how
| it's called, but if anyone out there can answer my
| question...
|
| Calling the print dialog from lyxfunc.C is easy:
| string LyXFu
I'm attempting to move the print dialog over to the SigC++
stuff. My interest is in the print form, rather than how
it's called, but if anyone out there can answer my
question...
Calling the print dialog from lyxfunc.C is easy:
string LyXFunc::Dispatch(int ac, char const * do_not_use_this_arg)
{
