Re: MathsSymbols status

2002-09-01 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 09:05:11AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > Hopefully, all symbols now exist, with the exception of AMS nrel. The > xbm does not have remotely static heights for the symbols, os it goes > horribly wrong. Martin, can you please look at this ? Do you mean that 320 is not divisib

MathsSymbols status

2002-08-29 Thread John Levon
Hopefully, all symbols now exist, with the exception of AMS nrel. The xbm does not have remotely static heights for the symbols, os it goes horribly wrong. Martin, can you please look at this ? wrt xforms, I think it would be a lot better for xforms to use these xpm's as well. This means we can