On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:14:08AM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> This way you "wouldn't" have to store the macros in the lyx document?
> (I know this is probably a bad idea, but I was just wondering)
Yes, that's definitely a bad idea as this will break as soon as the bug is
fixed.
Andre'
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:41:09AM -0500, Aleksandar Donev wrote:
> > I have noticed a feature of LyX which is very nice, but also
> > undocumented (as far as I can tell) and sometimes may be in the way, and
> > want to mention it. I have two papers op
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:41:09AM -0500, Aleksandar Donev wrote:
> I have noticed a feature of LyX which is very nice, but also
> undocumented (as far as I can tell) and sometimes may be in the way, and
> want to mention it. I have two papers open in LyX which have almost
> identical math-macro
Hello Lyx developers,
I have noticed a feature of LyX which is very nice, but also
undocumented (as far as I can tell) and sometimes may be in the way, and
want to mention it. I have two papers open in LyX which have almost
identical math-macro definitions in them. When I modify the "display"
