Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "Georg" == Georg Baum
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> writes:
>
> Georg> After some testing I found out that the problem is in
> Georg> boost::bind. It goes away if I only update boost::bind (see
> Georg> attached patch, I took it from Lars' boost-1.34 branch)
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> After some testing I found out that the problem is in
Georg> boost::bind. It goes away if I only update boost::bind (see
Georg> attached patch, I took it from Lars' boost-1.34 branch)). I do
Georg> not know boost::bind well enough to f
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But we don't really support external boost... so perhaps I should
> remove the possibility of using that instead.
That would be a step backward, since the long term goal is to not include
boost. We can support external boost 1.34 in trunk without problems, and
this is
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | For trunk
Lars> I propose to update the included boost to 1.34cvs, since boost
Lars> is | in freeze and boost 1.34 will probably be released before
Lars> LyX 1.5.0. Lars | wanted to do th
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > writes:
| >
| > | For trunk I propose to update the included boost to 1.34cvs, since boost
| > | is in freeze and boost 1.34 will probably be released before LyX 1.5.0.
| > | Lars wanted
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
> | For trunk I propose to update the included boost to 1.34cvs, since boost
> | is in freeze and boost 1.34 will probably be released before LyX 1.5.0.
> | Lars wanted to do that last month, but then came unicode ;-)
>
> Ju
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| For trunk I propose to update the included boost to 1.34cvs, since boost is
| in freeze and boost 1.34 will probably be released before LyX 1.5.0. Lars
| wanted to do that last month, but then came unicode ;-)
Just give me the "Go!" and I'll update boost
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> svn delete svn copy
| Lars>
|
| What version is the boost in trunk? Can there be problems wrt
| exceptions?
1.33.1/1.33.2
No, we have not changeed our boost wrt that.
--
Lgb
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I can parse Lars pretty well now and I guess he meant "Why _not_ use..." :-)
Lars> Right. Buttered-fat-fingers it is.
I did not parse it correctly, indeed.
Lars> svn delete svn copy
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| >> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Lars> Why now use the boost from trunk?
| > The idea is to use boost 1.33(.1) to fix the crashes we see in 1.4.x
| > with
| > boost::bind and gcc 4.1.
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Why now use the boost from trunk?
The idea is to use boost 1.33(.1) to fix the crashes we see in 1.4.x with
boost::bind and gcc 4.1.
I can parse Lars pretty well now and I guess he meant "Why _not_ us
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Why now use the boost from trunk?
The idea is to use boost 1.33(.1) to fix the crashes we see in 1.4.x with
boost::bind and gcc 4.1.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I guess we do not have a choice (please use 1.33.1, not 1.33).
I would use the boost from trunk, and that is 1.33.1 AFAIK.
> I
> looked at the patch between our two boost versions (branch and trunk)
> and the diff is 'only' 2.4Mb, not more than the routine po/ patc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| >> Actually, in an ideal world, upgrading to 1.33.1 should not be
| >> needed either. Upgrading a full library because of what is probably
| >> a few lines worth of patch is lazy. But I
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Actually, in an ideal world, upgrading to 1.33.1 should not be
>> needed either. Upgrading a full library because of what is probably
>> a few lines worth of patch is lazy. But I do not think we have a
>> choice.
Georg> IMO investigating
Am Freitag, 18. August 2006 17:07 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Michael> Are there any reasons why we cannot update to boost 1.3.4 for
> Michael> 1.4.3? Michael
>
> Maybe Because it is not released yet? And what is it going to give
"Michael Gerz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Are there any reasons why we cannot update to boost 1.3.4 for 1.4.3?
1.34 is not released. Doesn't 1.33 work?
--
Lgb
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Are there any reasons why we cannot update to boost 1.3.4 for
Michael> 1.4.3? Michael
Maybe Because it is not released yet? And what is it going to give us?
Actually, in an ideal world, upgrading to 1.33.1 should not be needed
Are there any reasons why we cannot update to boost 1.3.4 for 1.4.3?
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: Math-intensive work in 1.4.x impossible.
"José&q
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> It is not to bad. Did you actually check that it fixes the gcc 4.1
> bug? If it does we should go this way.
I did (only bug 2677), with system boost 1.33 and a snapshot of 1.34cvs,
therefore the additional BOOST_VERSION stuff.
This patch is the bare minimum needed fo
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> José> Although I should not say this now, Lars was right when he
> José> wanted to update boost before 1.4 release. ;-)
>
> Yes :)
Indeed. But afterwards you always know more.
Georg
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Thursday 17 August 2006 21:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> And then there is an huge boost patch, right?
José> Although I should not say this now, Lars was right when he
José> wanted to update boost before 1.4 release. ;-)
Yes
On Thursday 17 August 2006 21:30, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> And then there is an huge boost patch, right?
Although I should not say this now, Lars was right when he wanted to update
boost before 1.4 release. ;-)
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What do we have to do to upgrade boost like that?
Georg> This. Well, the BOOST_VERSION stuff is only necessary if you
Georg> also want to be able to use 1.34cvs. It is taken from Lars' new
Georg> boost branch and slightly adapted, the re
Am Donnerstag, 17. August 2006 21:41 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Georg> Am Donnerstag, 17. August 2006 20:00 schrieb José Matos:
> >> I am running FC5 as well but as reported in this thread this seems
> >> to
> Georg> be an
> >> issue
25 matches
Mail list logo
