On Nov 10, 2005, at 4:09 PM, Bennett Helm wrote:
On Nov 10, 2005, at 3:47 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote:
Correct. As it appears that doesn't fix your problem. Have you tried
compiling a gcc 4.0.2 yourself and using that?
Wouldn't you know it: Xcode 2.2 has just shown up on Apple's
server, cont
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Bennett Helm wrote:
|
| > Thanks, Georg. I haven't been able to get it to work by replacing the
| > regex bits. But I suspect this may show more about my lack of
| > understanding of what I'm doing than whether boost 1.33 would work.
| > Could you be more
Bennett Helm wrote:
> Thanks, Georg. I haven't been able to get it to work by replacing the
> regex bits. But I suspect this may show more about my lack of
> understanding of what I'm doing than whether boost 1.33 would work.
> Could you be more explicit about which parts I should be replacing?
I
> On Nov 10, 2005, at 3:47 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote:
>
> Wouldn't you know it: Xcode 2.2 has just shown up on Apple's server,
> containing gcc-4.0.1. At 833MB, it'll take a while for me to
> download; I'll test tomorrow.
>
> Bennett
>
Hello Bennett,
thanks for the tip. I just downloaded and inst
On Nov 10, 2005, at 3:47 PM, Michael Abshoff wrote:
Correct. As it appears that doesn't fix your problem. Have you tried
compiling a gcc 4.0.2 yourself and using that?
Wouldn't you know it: Xcode 2.2 has just shown up on Apple's server,
containing gcc-4.0.1. At 833MB, it'll take a while for
> On Nov 10, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Hammer Armin wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael, is this what you intended: the difference between the
> original gcc-4.0 build 4061 and the gcc-4.0 build 5026 I have?
>
Correct. As it appears that doesn't fix your problem. Have you tried
compiling a gcc 4.0.2 you
On Nov 10, 2005, at 12:40 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
Bennett Helm wrote:
I've normally been compiling lyx-140 on Mac OS X with gcc 3.3 for
backwards compatibility, and everything works fine. However, looking
forward to supporting Intel-based Macs will require gcc-4.0. When I
try, however, I get the
On Nov 10, 2005, at 1:49 PM, Hammer Armin wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hello,
while I have not tried to compile lyx with gcc 4.0 on MacOSX the
group I
work in had some problems with that particular gcc. In our case
updating
to XCode 2.1 (which you get for free on the apple development
website -
c
Hi Michael,
> Hello,
>
> while I have not tried to compile lyx with gcc 4.0 on MacOSX the group I
> work in had some problems with that particular gcc. In our case updating
> to XCode 2.1 (which you get for free on the apple development website -
> caution download size is roughly 750M) solved ou
Hi Bennett,
I've encountered the same problem on Tiger using XCode 2.1 (which uses
gcc 4.0.0). My solution was to build gcc 4.0.2 on macosx from the source
and compile lyx-1.4.0cvs with it. With gcc 4.0.2 lyx compiles without
problem on macosx.
I expect Apple upgrade to gcc4.0.2 on XCode 2.2.
> Bennett Helm wrote:
>
>> I've normally been compiling lyx-140 on Mac OS X with gcc 3.3 for
>> backwards compatibility, and everything works fine. However, looking
>> forward to supporting Intel-based Macs will require gcc-4.0. When I
>> try, however, I get the error copied below.
>>
>> Any sugges
Bennett Helm wrote:
> I've normally been compiling lyx-140 on Mac OS X with gcc 3.3 for
> backwards compatibility, and everything works fine. However, looking
> forward to supporting Intel-based Macs will require gcc-4.0. When I
> try, however, I get the error copied below.
>
> Any suggestions on
I've normally been compiling lyx-140 on Mac OS X with gcc 3.3 for
backwards compatibility, and everything works fine. However, looking
forward to supporting Intel-based Macs will require gcc-4.0. When I
try, however, I get the error copied below.
Any suggestions on a fix?
Thanks.
Bennett
13 matches
Mail list logo
