Re: Lyx 1.0.3 and XForms 0.89

1999-09-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Carlos" == Carlos A M dos Santos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Where are these TRUE and FALSE used? Carlos> LaTeXLog.C You are right. I did not spot it because these references have been fixed in the current cvs repository. You should find out that version 1.0.4pre8 compiles fin

Re: Lyx 1.0.3 and XForms 0.89

1999-09-23 Thread Carlos A M dos Santos
On 23 Sep 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I have a question about your patch: why is the following stuff needed? > > Carlos> + /* for compatibilities */ + #ifndef FALSE + # define > Carlos> FALSE 0 + # define TRUE 1 + #endif + #endif /* _CONFIG_H > Carlos> */ Previous versions o

Re: Lyx 1.0.3 and XForms 0.89

1999-09-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Hello, Thanks for your report. While I am not sure about the crash itself (I'll have to get 0.89 and try it out), I have a question about your patch: why is the following stuff needed? Carlos> + /* for compatibilities */ + #ifndef FALSE + # define Carlos> FALSE 0 + # define TRUE 1 + #en

Lyx 1.0.3 and XForms 0.89

1999-09-22 Thread Carlos A M dos Santos
Hello I compiled lyx 1.0.3 in the following environment: Slackware Linux version 3.4 (heavy modified), kernel 2.0.38, libc 5.4.46, gcc 2.7.2.3, XFree86 3.3.3.1 and Xforms 0.89. The attaced patch was necessary, because of small differences in the new "forms.h". I expected no problems, since the X