On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:23:49PM +, John Levon wrote:
> It's a pity to lose the charm of Juergen's comment but I'm just not very
> charming ...
You could create an "old_comments" file in development ;-)
(and rename TodoPlan-1.3 intp TodoPlan-1.5)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Free
n 1.288
diff -u -p -r1.288 text2.C
--- text2.C 13 Mar 2003 21:19:01 - 1.288
+++ text2.C 13 Mar 2003 22:21:58 -
@@ -2465,30 +2465,31 @@ LyXText::text_status LyXText::status() c
}
-void LyXText::status(BufferView * bview, LyXText::text_status st) const
+void LyXText::st
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 09:59:34PM +, John Levon wrote:
>
>2482 if (status_ != NEED_MORE_REFRESH || st != NEED_VERY_LITTLE_REFRESH) {
OK OK I can't read. Sorry for the noice
john
2482 if (status_ != NEED_MORE_REFRESH || st != NEED_VERY_LITTLE_REFRESH) {
Umm.
I guess I'll fix this so it reflects what the comment says rather than
the nonsensical code.
john
2638 // We should only go up with refreshing code so this means that if
2639 // we have a MORE refresh we should never set it to LITTLE if we still
2640 // didn't handle it (and then it will be UNCHANGED. Now as long as
2641 // we stay inside one LyXTex
