On Wednesday 14 May 2008 07:40:41 José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008 23:30:05 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Jose, when you wrote this have you actually tried to compile it? i just
> > got next report that 1.5.5 fails to compile with --disable-pch
> > --without-included-boost on 4.3.
>
> I remember
On Tuesday 13 May 2008 23:30:05 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jose, when you wrote this have you actually tried to compile it? i just got
> next report that 1.5.5 fails to compile with --disable-pch
> --without-included-boost on 4.3.
I remember to have tested --disable-pch but I don't remember if it was at
José Matos wrote:
> On Saturday 29 March 2008 01:54:17 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > if we just add will it work with 4.3?
>
> Yes. :-)
Jose, when you wrote this have you actually tried to compile it? i just got next
report that 1.5.5 fails to compile with --disable-pch --without-included-boost
on 4
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> ok, this should go to branch.
OK.
> i let the decision whether to keep
> stdlib.h on Juergen.
Let's keep it for now.
Jürgen
> > if we just add will it work with 4.3?
>
> Yes. :-)
ok, this should go to branch. i let the decision whether to keep
stdlib.h on Juergen.
pavel
Index: src/insets/InsetBibtex.cpp
===
--- src/insets/InsetBibtex.cpp (revision 24
On Saturday 29 March 2008 01:54:17 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> if we just add will it work with 4.3?
Yes. :-)
> pavel
--
José Abílio
> It fails on src/insets/InsetBibtex.cpp where an #include is needed
> and in src/support/abort.cpp where an #include is required.
>
> The later is funny because #include is not enough.
>
> That file has a
>
> #ifdef HAVE_STDLIB_H
> # include
> #endif
>
> because the C standard does not re
> Convert.cpp now compiles with the patch added.
> I also had to add
> #include
> to socktools.cpp to get it to compile.
yes, these headers seems to be ok. i commited them.
> However, I still get the fo;;owing strange failure:
maybe Stefan has some idea?
> /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compil
On 29/03/2008, at 3:28 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger, the following patch helps wrt convert.cpp ?
pavel
Pavel
Convert.cpp now compiles with the patch added.
I also had to add
#include
to socktools.cpp to get it to compile.
However, I still get the fo;;owing strange failure:
/bin/sh .
On Friday 28 March 2008 16:24:20 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> courageous ;) http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/18/2335206
I am not running this on x86_64 that was affected by this particular bug,
but even if I was a fix was ready. So I have no complain.
> btw i have seen some complaint about
> > $ g++ t.cpp
> > t.cpp: In function ???int main()???:
> > t.cpp:4: error: ???strtol??? is not a member of ???std???
> >
> > strtol is declared in
> > http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/clibrary/cstdlib/strtol.html
>
> PS: As you know by now I am using gcc 4.3.0
courageous ;) http://it.slashd
>
> I am not. :-)
> $ g++ t.cpp
> t.cpp: In function ???int main()???:
> t.cpp:4: error: ???strtol??? is not a member of ???std???
>
> strtol is declared in
> http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/clibrary/cstdlib/strtol.html
ai :) btw have you tried to put '' into google :D ?
Roger, the followin
On Friday 28 March 2008 15:51:39 José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 28 March 2008 15:40:09 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > #include
> >
> > int main(){
> > return std::strtol("5",0,10);
> > }
>
> I am not. :-)
> $ g++ t.cpp
> t.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
> t.cpp:4: error: ‘strtol’ is not a member of
On Friday 28 March 2008 15:40:09 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> #include
>
> int main(){
> return std::strtol("5",0,10);
> }
I am not. :-)
$ g++ t.cpp
t.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
t.cpp:4: error: ‘strtol’ is not a member of ‘std’
strtol is declared in
http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/clibra
> Pavel,
> I tried your patch in support/convert.cpp:
> namespace lyx {
> using boost::lexical_cast;
> +using std::strtol;
> +using std::strtoul;
> +using std::strtod;
> template<>
> string convert(bool b)
> But I got the same errors:
are you able to compile the attached ?
pavel
#include
int m
anda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 27 March 2008 11:40:42 PM
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyX1.6svn Build Errors Mac OSX 10.5.2 Leopard
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mac mini
XCode 3.0
LyX1.6svn revision 23995
To get convert.cpp to compile I had to add
#include
i dont think this
On 28/03/2008, at 5:17 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 27 March 2008 11:40:42 PM
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: LyX1.6svn Build Errors Mac OSX 10.5.2 Leopard
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mac mini
XCode 3.0
LyX1.6svn revision 23995
> Mac mini
> XCode 3.0
> LyX1.6svn revision 23995
>
> To get convert.cpp to compile I had to add
> #include
i dont think this is the right patch. you havent anwered to my
last reply/patch.
pavel
Mac mini
XCode 3.0
LyX1.6svn revision 23995
To get convert.cpp to compile I had to add
#include
To get socktools.cpp to compile I had to add
#include
Further more drastic problems:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../
src -I./.. -I../../boost -DQT_
19 matches
Mail list logo