Re: LyX version numbers

2006-04-24 Thread Jose' Matos
On Sunday 23 April 2006 22:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Time flies... anyway, this is now included in the page list. > > I'm still slightly worried it's a bit to technical for normal users to > read. Anyway, I'll ask on the user's list for opinions, but first I'd like > for someone to verify that

Re: LyX version numbers

2006-04-23 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Jose' Matos wrote: > > > > http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXVersionNumbers > If I don't hear any objections tomorrow I'll add it to the list of pages > so that it shows up more prominently. Time flies... anyway, this is now included

Re: LyX version numbers

2006-04-08 Thread christian . ridderstrom
On Sat, 8 Apr 2006, Jose' Matos wrote: > > http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXVersionNumbers > > Should I let it stay on the users' wiki, should it be moved to the > > developers' wiki or simply removed (i.e. is it redundant)? > > I like, but then I am suspect (for some reason that I have convenie

Re: LyX version numbers

2006-04-08 Thread Jose' Matos
On Saturday 08 April 2006 14:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I read a post by Jose' in the user's list and started thinking about > version numbers used by LyX. Eventually I tried explaining it to > myself and wrote it down here: > > http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXVersionNumbers > > I've pasted th

LyX version numbers

2006-04-08 Thread christian . ridderstrom
I read a post by Jose' in the user's list and started thinking about version numbers used by LyX. Eventually I tried explaining it to myself and wrote it down here: http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXVersionNumbers I've pasted the text below for convenience. Is the text correct? What have I misse