Simon Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > I wasn't sure whether my xforms was compiled for glibc2.1 or not, so I got
| > > the latest from the xforms site. LyX wouldn't compile with xforms-0.89,
| > > it got errors while linking.
0.89 works, your installation is probably wrong.
| Well, yes,
Hello Juergen,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote:
>
> On 19-Jun-2000 Simon Hill wrote:
> >
> > I wasn't sure whether my xforms was compiled for glibc2.1 or not, so I got
> > the latest from the xforms site. LyX wouldn't compile with xforms-0.89,
> > it got errors while linking. Compiled
On 19-Jun-2000 Simon Hill wrote:
>
> I wasn't sure whether my xforms was compiled for glibc2.1 or not, so I got
> the latest from the xforms site. LyX wouldn't compile with xforms-0.89,
> it got errors while linking. Compiled and linked fine with xforms-0.88.
> However, it still segfaults when I
Hello Jean-Marc,
On 19 Jun 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> The important part: did you make sure that you got a xforms compiled
> for glibc2.1? Having a xforms compiled for glibc2.0 will always
> segfaults in such cases (in fact, it will segfault whenever xforms tries
> to write an error mes
> "Simon" == Simon Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Simon> Hello, Just upgraded to 1.1.5 after 1.0.2 started segfaulting
Simon> on me. Turned out that 1.1.5 segfaulted as well. So I tried
Simon> starting another X client, and got a long stream of color
Simon> allocation failure messages. Real
Hello,
Just upgraded to 1.1.5 after 1.0.2 started segfaulting on me. Turned out
that 1.1.5 segfaulted as well. So I tried starting another X client, and
got a long stream of color allocation failure messages. Realized I had a
vnc session up, shut that down, and tried again. Presto, LyX works fine
