Hi Ruurd,
I totally agree with you! However, there are still more issues with the
free
Qt. And, things will probably come up after more rigorous testing. Besides
the font thing, people reported cpu hogging and errors when selecting
text.
Did you compile the library with option "-release"? Sometim
Michael Schmitt wrote:
I can also provide you with a LyX 1.3.6cvs binary but I guess it
is no yet ready for public release (e.g., LyX/Win32 complains
about not being able to write to "/tmp").
Because this directory does not exist and LyX doesn't try and create it.
Create it yourself and things wil
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
Ruurd> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma
Ruurd> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmm, these values seem very weird to me... I cannot understand how
>>
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
Ruurd> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma
Ruurd> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Ruurd, about your distributions: I seem to remember that LyX/Win
>> 1
"Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ruurd, about your distributions: I seem to remember that LyX/Win 1.3.3
> was distributed with the docs from the HEAD of lyxdoc, which have been
> updat
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Ruurd> Some reverse engineering reveils that the height is substracted
> Ruurd> from the y value.
>
> This looks much better...
>
> Angus, what about checking that in?
Sure. Go for it. (My tree is currently full of package-related stuff.)
--
Angus
> "Peter" == Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> I've fixed the wrong y-values of boundingBox. qt/gpl now gives
Peter> the same as "3.3.3 Win32 Eval". I hope this is a step in the
Peter> right direction.
Thanks a lot, Peter. It seems that it really helps.
JMarc
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
Ruurd> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma
Ruurd> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Hmm, these values seem very weird to me... I cannot understand how
>>
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> I totally agree with you! However, there are still more issues
Ruurd> with the free Qt. And, things will probably come up after more
Ruurd> rigorous testing. Besides the font thing, people reported cpu
Ruurd> hogging and errors when
Michael,
> IMHO there is no need to worry about the behaviour of Qt 3.2.1/Win any
more.
>
> Yesterday evening, one of the guys of the Free Qt/Win32 team fixed the
font
> metrics bug. I checked the fix and everything looks pretty good. Even the
> display of math formula has improved _significantly_
Michael Schmitt wrote:
> I can also provide you with a LyX 1.3.6cvs binary but I guess it
> is no yet ready for public release (e.g., LyX/Win32 complains
> about not being able to write to "/tmp").
Because this directory does not exist and LyX doesn't try and create it.
Create it yourself and thi
write to "/tmp").
Kind regards,
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Ruurd Reitsma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 4:02 PM
Subject: Re: LyX needs help: Broken font metrics computation
"Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTEC
"Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, these values seem very weird to me... I cannot understand how qt
> 3.2.1 could have been sooo broken.
>
Some reverse engineering reveils that the h
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> "Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
Ruurd> message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> The 3.2.1nc value is strange. It may be related to the QFontMetrics
>> change I just mentioned elsewhere in this thread. It may be that qt
"Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The 3.2.1nc value is strange. It may be related to the QFontMetrics
> change I just mentioned elsewhere in this thread. It may be that qt
> 3.2.x is not usable for us in windows, or that we have to translate
> the
> Ruurd> 3.2.1 NC: top: -22 bottom: -12
> Ruurd> 3.3.3 Win32 Eval: top: -11 bottom: -1
I've fixed the wrong y-values of boundingBox.
qt/gpl now gives the same as "3.3.3 Win32 Eval".
I hope this is a step in the right direction.
Peter
Ruurd> 3.2.1 NC: top: -22 bottom: -12
Ruurd> 3.3.3 Win32 Eval: top: -11 bottom: -1
I've fixed the wrong y-values of boundingBox.
qt/gpl now gives the same as "3.3.3 Win32 Eval".
I hope this is a step in the right direction.
Peter
Jean-Marc,
Michael, a quick question: are you sure of your test program?
No, I am not sure. I just tried to create the smallest possible test case
that does not crash and produces some "reasonable" output. To make sure we
are not hunting a phantom, we can use the Qt example "examples/drawdemo/"
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> What output do you have with Michael's testcase in Qt/Win 3.2.1 NC?
Ruurd> 3.2.1 NC: top: -22 bottom: -12
Ruurd> 3.3.3 Win32 Eval: top: -11 bottom: -1
The second one is normal, according to
http://doc.trolltech.com/3.3/qrect.html#de
> "Michael" == Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Dear Ralf, Christian, and all others, as you have already
Michael> noticed, the LyX team is working on a native Win32 port of
Michael> their text processor, using your GPL'd QT/Win32. Things have
Michael> progressed nicely in
"Jean-Marc Lasgouttes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Ruurd> On the Lyx side, this helps:
> [...]
> Ruurd> At least, with Non-Commercial 3.2.1.
>
> So you mean that official Qt/Win and Qt/X have different
> "Ruurd" == Ruurd Reitsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ruurd> On the Lyx side, this helps:
[...]
Ruurd> At least, with Non-Commercial 3.2.1.
So you mean that official Qt/Win and Qt/X have different semantics for
font metrics? This is mind-boggling.
What output do you have with Michael's tes
"Michael Schmitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> However, we have a serious problem with the computation of font metrics. I
> have generated a small test case that illustrates the problem:
>
> #include
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv) {
> QApplication app(argc,
Dear Ralf, Christian, and all others,
as you have already noticed, the LyX team is working on a native Win32 port
of their text processor, using your GPL'd QT/Win32. Things have progressed
nicely in the last couple of weeks and Qt/Win32 seems to work quite well.
However, we have a serious proble
24 matches
Mail list logo
