Re: LyX is getting... very annoying.

2007-02-23 Thread Georg Baum
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:40:32PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: >> You probably mean MathMBoxInset, which indeed can store real >> text. The problem is that it cannot be used because it requires a >> BufferView in the constructor, and that is not available when the inset >> need

Re: LyX is getting... very annoying.

2007-02-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:40:32PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:27:01AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > >> This has not happened so far because some internal code dependencies made > >> it almost impossible. Abdel has cleaned this up a lot, and I beli

Re: LyX is getting... very annoying.

2007-02-22 Thread Georg Baum
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > No, LyXText does not need a Buffer. Indeed, that was an intermediate step. > AFAIS, the only place where a Buffer is needed in InsetMathMBox is in > InsetMathMBox::write(). A special case for this object when this method > is called is all that is needed. This is a ma

Re: LyX is getting... very annoying.

2007-02-22 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Georg Baum wrote: Not really. You probably mean MathMBoxInset, which indeed can store real text. The problem is that it cannot be used because it requires a BufferView in the constructor, and that is not available when the inset needs to be created. Believe me, I tried to enable this ~ 2 years a

Re: LyX is getting... very annoying.

2007-02-22 Thread Georg Baum
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 09:27:01AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: >> This has not happened so far because some internal code dependencies made >> it almost impossible. Abdel has cleaned this up a lot, and I believe it >> is possible to implement it now, but in won't happen for 1.5