Re: LyX binary size Qt vs. Xforms; huge difference!

2002-10-09 Thread Lior Silberman
There's no -g in the flags list for the Qt front-end. The difference probably represents debug information. Lior On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Rob Lahaye wrote: > > Hi, > > Compiling CVS: > > Xforms LyX = 103M (stripped: 5M ) > > Qt LyX = 7Mb (stripped: 4M ) > > Xforms is recent RC5. > Qt i

Re: LyX binary size Qt vs. Xforms; huge difference!

2002-10-09 Thread Rob Lahaye
Rob Lahaye wrote: > > Hi, > > Compiling CVS: > >Xforms LyX = 103M (stripped: 5M ) > >Qt LyX = 7Mb (stripped: 4M ) > > Xforms is recent RC5. > Qt is 3.0.5. > > Any reason for this huge difference in unstripped file sizes? Ah, looking at my own mail, I realized that's it's probably th

Re: LyX binary size Qt vs. Xforms; huge difference!

2002-10-09 Thread Edwin Leuven
> Qt LyX = 7Mb (stripped: 4M ) with qt-2.3.1 I get: -rwxrwxr-x1 leuven80M Oct 9 11:10 src/lyx Built on Oct 9 2002, 11:08:37 Configuration Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu Special build flags:warnings assertions C Compiler:

LyX binary size Qt vs. Xforms; huge difference!

2002-10-09 Thread Rob Lahaye
Hi, Compiling CVS: Xforms LyX = 103M (stripped: 5M ) Qt LyX = 7Mb (stripped: 4M ) Xforms is recent RC5. Qt is 3.0.5. Any reason for this huge difference in unstripped file sizes? Cheers, Rob. PS: these are the version outputs, LyX 1.3.0cvs of Fri, May 3, 2002 Built on Oct 8 2002,