Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-06 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 07:23:52PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > >This is what I initially thought, but no k+m+2 is still ok because we > >check against < MAX_WD_LEN-1 not <= MAX_WD_LEN-1. > > I patched and recompiled, same warning as expected from the last posts. Yes, the warning won't g

Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-06 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Le 06/02/2020 à 18:16, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda

Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-06 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:16:00PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at

Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-06 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:01:26PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > I looked at the code an

Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-06 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 05:46:57PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the > > > reported > > > lin

Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-06 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the > > reported > > line (247) by the previous if clause. > > What is not clear to me are two

Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-06 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the > reported > line (247) by the previous if clause. > What is not clear to me are two following lines, which add m+1 chars while the > check seem to properly handl

Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-06 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 12:59:53PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > I looked at the code and the buffer length seems properly handled in the > reported > line (247) by the previous if clause. > What is not clear to me are two following lines, which add m+1 chars while the > check seem to properly handl

Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-06 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 06:52:29PM +0100, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote: > Le 31/01/2020 ? 20:46, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : > >Public release of LyX version 2.3.4 > >=== > > > >We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.3.4. This is the fourth > >maintenance re

Re: LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-02-05 Thread Jean-Pierre Chrétien
Le 31/01/2020 à 20:46, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : Public release of LyX version 2.3.4 === We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.3.4. This is the fourth maintenance release in the 2.3.x series. I got a working LyX installation where the 4 UserGuides

LyX 2.3.4 is Released

2020-01-31 Thread Richard Kimberly Heck
Public release of LyX version 2.3.4 === We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.3.4. This is the fourth maintenance release in the 2.3.x series. You can download LyX 2.3.4 from http://www.lyx.org/Download/. LyX is a document processor that encourages an appr