FYI : I use Lyx 2.3.2 with High Sierra (10.13.6), without any slowing down for
the forward and reverse search.
> Le 20 déc. 2018 à 09:56, Robert Betz a écrit :
>
> Stephan,
>
> I agree. It seems to be an issue with Mojave. I cannot be 100% sure as I
> have not tried the new version on an ol
Stephan,
I agree. It seems to be an issue with Mojave. I cannot be 100% sure as I have
not tried the new version on an old version of the Mac.
Mojave seems to have a lot of checks (for security reasons I guess) on program
interactions, and they seem to slow things down a lot.
Regards,
Bob
On 2018-12-14 17:09, Chris Menzel wrote:
I'm always hesitant to complain about this brilliant piece of software
but, for me (Mojave 10.14.2 Beta) with this version, forward search (LyX
⟶ Skim) is still very slow and reverse search (Skim ⟶ LyX) appears to be
nonfunctional. I've of course checked
Hi Bob,
is it a problem with LyX 2.3.2 and with 2.3.1 forward search is fast?
My guess was: it’s a problem new with Mojave…
Regards,
Stephan
> Am 16.12.2018 um 15:34 schrieb Robert Betz :
>
> I have noticed that Lyx V2.3.2 under Mac OSX 10.14.1 (Mojave) has a very slow
> forward search. Seem
I have noticed that Lyx V2.3.2 under Mac OSX 10.14.1 (Mojave) has a very slow
forward search. Seems to take a couple of seconds.
This was reported by another user as well. In addition he was having problems
with the reverse search working. Reverse search on my system is working well,
and does
I have filed the bug report and downgraded to 2.3.1.
greetings, el
On 2018-12-16 11:33 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> Anders,
>
> That is correct.
>
> el
>
> Sent from Dr Lisse’s iPad mini 4
> On 16 Dec 2018, 10:39 +0200, Anders Ekberg , wrote:
>> On 16 Dec 2018, at 08:28, Dr Eberhard W Lisse
Anders,
That is correct.
el
Sent from Dr Lisse’s iPad mini 4
On 16 Dec 2018, 10:39 +0200, Anders Ekberg , wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2018, at 08:28, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> >
> > Will do.
> >
> > But, can you reproduce?
> >
> > el
> >
> > Sent from Dr Lisse’s iPad mini 4
> > On 16 Dec 2018, 04:24
On 16 Dec 2018, at 08:28, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
> Will do.
>
> But, can you reproduce?
>
> el
>
> Sent from Dr Lisse’s iPad mini 4
> On 16 Dec 2018, 04:24 +0200, Richard Kimberly Heck , wrote:
>> On 12/15/18 7:48 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> but I noticed a real nui
Will do.
But, can you reproduce?
el
Sent from Dr Lisse’s iPad mini 4
On 16 Dec 2018, 04:24 +0200, Richard Kimberly Heck , wrote:
> On 12/15/18 7:48 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> > Thanks,
> >
> > but I noticed a real nuisance on Mojave 10.14.1
> >
> > When I click on the Text Style button it us
On 2018-12-16 03:24, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
On 12/15/18 7:48 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
Thanks,
but I noticed a real nuisance on Mojave 10.14.1
When I click on the Text Style button it uses default which I do not
like (and not the default one :-)-O). When I manually change them and
cl
On 12/15/18 7:48 PM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> but I noticed a real nuisance on Mojave 10.14.1
>
> When I click on the Text Style button it uses default which I do not
> like (and not the default one :-)-O). When I manually change them and
> click on marked text it makes the change as
On 12/15/18 4:54 AM, José Abílio Matos wrote:
> On Friday, 14 December 2018 15.31.42 WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>> Public release of LyX version 2.3.2
>> ===
> Hi Riki,
> thank for the release. :-)
>
> The first issue is the message subject is wrong, 2.
On Friday, 14 December 2018 15.31.42 WET Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.3.2
> ===
Hi Riki,
thank for the release. :-)
The first issue is the message subject is wrong, 2.2.3 -> 2.3.2 (the order
matters here :-) ).
> What's
I'm always hesitant to complain about this brilliant piece of software but,
for me (Mojave 10.14.2 Beta) with this version, forward search (LyX ⟶ Skim)
is still very slow and reverse search (Skim ⟶ LyX) appears to be
nonfunctional. I've of course checked all the usual settings.
-chris
On Fri, Dec
PLEASE NOTE: Windows binaries are not yet available, due to a late-
discovered bug. Installers should be available within a few days.
Public release of LyX version 2.3.2
===
We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.3.2. This is the second
maintenance release
Den 31. jan. 2018 21:25, skrev Scott Kostyshak:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 01:39:31PM +, Helge Hafting wrote:
File->Export->PDF is supposed to create a PDF in a temp directory, and then
copy it to the right place.
For me, this fails when the working directory is on a sshfs mount. (It works
f
This is now bug 11100, sorry for taking so long time to register it.
Helge Hafting
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 08:25:17PM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 01:39:31PM +, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > File->Export->PDF is supposed to create a PDF in a temp directory, and then
> > copy it to the right place.
> >
> > For me, this fails when the working directory is
On 2018-02-07, Helge Hafting wrote:
> To see the problem, set the typewriter font to "Tex Gyre Cursor".
> Check "Use non-TeX fonts (via XeTeX/LuaTeX)"
> Now, write something like "cat >> myfile.txt" (for a linux tutorial)
> Set the text style to "code", or customize it to "typewriter", or use
>
To see the problem, set the typewriter font to "Tex Gyre Cursor".
Check "Use non-TeX fonts (via XeTeX/LuaTeX)"
Now, write something like "cat >> myfile.txt" (for a linux tutorial)
Set the text style to "code", or customize it to "typewriter", or use
the paragraph style "LyX Code".
Any way
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 01:39:31PM +, Helge Hafting wrote:
> File->Export->PDF is supposed to create a PDF in a temp directory, and then
> copy it to the right place.
>
> For me, this fails when the working directory is on a sshfs mount. (It works
> fine on a local filesystem)
>
> This has wo
File->Export->PDF is supposed to create a PDF in a temp directory, and
then copy it to the right place.
For me, this fails when the working directory is on a sshfs mount. (It
works fine on a local filesystem)
This has worked for many years, but this week I see a mysterious failure:
$ cd /hom
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Le 10/07/2017 à 20:21, Felipe Formiga a écrit :
>
>> Hi LMarc
>>
>> Sorry about my delay.
>>
>> Thank you very much for your help.
>> I have tried your suggestion. Now, after "make" commando, a got this
>> message:
>>
>
> This is rela
Le 10/07/2017 à 20:21, Felipe Formiga a écrit :
Hi LMarc
Sorry about my delay.
Thank you very much for your help.
I have tried your suggestion. Now, after "make" commando, a got this
message:
This is related to the following thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg194
’:
/usr/include/QtCore/qthreadstorage.h:136: instantiated from
‘QThreadStorage::QThreadStorage() [with T = int]’
sgml.cpp:141: instantiated from here
/usr/include/QtCore/qthreadstorage.h:133: error: invalid static_cast
from type ‘void*’ to type ‘int’
make[4]: *** [sgml.o] Error 1
make[4]:
Le 01/06/2017 à 20:35, Felipe Formiga a écrit :
Hi all
Really sorry if I'm posting in the error place
I'm trying to compile lx-2.2.3 in a RedHat 6.8.
After I used ./configure I got this message:
---
Configuration
Host type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Special build flags:
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 03:35:02PM -0300, Felipe Formiga wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Really sorry if I'm posting in the error place
Hi Felipe!
This is a good place to ask this question. We have a couple of Fedora
users around here I think.
> I'm trying to compile lx-2.2.3 in a RedHat 6.8.
> After I use
t_ofstd::is_bind_expression::value, (std::is_placeholder::value >
0)>(_Bound_args, std::tuple<_UElements ...>)>::type ...)>::type
std::_Bind<_Functor(_Bound_args ...)>::operator()(_Args& ...) const
volatile [with _Args = int, int, _Functor = void (*)(pid_t, int),
On 05/16/2017 03:34 AM, Cor Blom wrote:
> Op 16-05-17 om 04:45 schreef Nandor Sieben:
>> The source files for 2.2.3 seem to be missing.
>
> Yes, they seem not to be copied to
> ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/2.2.x/
>
> Can this be corrected?
I will investigate when I get home. They were there..
Op 16-05-17 om 04:45 schreef Nandor Sieben:
The source files for 2.2.3 seem to be missing.
Yes, they seem not to be copied to ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/stable/2.2.x/
Can this be corrected? Thanks,
Cor
The source files for 2.2.3 seem to be missing.
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> Public release of LyX version 2.2.3
> ===
>
> We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.2.3. This is the third
> maintenance release in t
Public release of LyX version 2.2.3
===
We are proud to announce the release of LyX 2.2.3. This is the third
maintenance release in the 2.2.x series.
You can download LyX 2.2.3 from http://www.lyx.org/Download/.
LyX is a document processor that encourages an
On 2017-04-26, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 04/26/2017 10:57 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2017-04-24, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> Since the 2.3-alpha tarballs were imminent, I decided to delay producing
>>> the 2.2.3 tarballs for a bit. I'll build them once alpha is out.
>> Is 2.2.3 the last in the 2.2 s
On 04/26/2017 10:57 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-04-24, Richard Heck wrote:
>> Since the 2.3-alpha tarballs were imminent, I decided to delay producing
>> the 2.2.3 tarballs for a bit. I'll build them once alpha is out.
> Is 2.2.3 the last in the 2.2 series or is a 2.2.4 release planned?
The
On 04/26/2017 10:57 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-04-24, Richard Heck wrote:
>> Since the 2.3-alpha tarballs were imminent, I decided to delay producing
>> the 2.2.3 tarballs for a bit. I'll build them once alpha is out.
> Is 2.2.3 the last in the 2.2 series or is a 2.2.4 release planned?
The
On 2017-04-24, Richard Heck wrote:
> Since the 2.3-alpha tarballs were imminent, I decided to delay producing
> the 2.2.3 tarballs for a bit. I'll build them once alpha is out.
Is 2.2.3 the last in the 2.2 series or is a 2.2.4 release planned?
Is there a chance to get a backards-compatibility ens
e attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion
> > > > routines. Could this please go in for LyX 2.2.3?
> > >
> > > OK.
> > >
> > > rh
> >
> > -1
> > Unless the export of examples/PDF-form.lyx to format lyx21 is lo
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Samstag, 15. April 2017 um 22:21:04, schrieb Richard Heck
> > On 04/15/2017 02:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > the attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion
> > > routines. Could
El 24.04.2017 a las 17:31, Richard Heck escribió:
OK.
It is in.
regards Uwe
Since the 2.3-alpha tarballs were imminent, I decided to delay producing
the 2.2.3 tarballs for a bit. I'll build them once alpha is out.
Richard
t;
> this patch fixed some issues but Math.lyx uncovered an issue that I
> introduced with this patch.
> Attached is the patch for LyX 2.2.3 that allows to revert Math.lyx again.
>
> sorry and regards
> Uwe
patch.
Attached is the patch for LyX 2.2.3 that allows to revert Math.lyx again.
sorry and regards
Uwe
diff --git
"a/C:\\Users\\Usti\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\TortoiseGit\\lyx_2_2-cac7b00.001.py"
"b/D:\\LyXGit\\2.2.x\\lib\\lyx2lyx\\lyx_2_2.py"
index c30477de17..a65f8ca67d 1006
El 17.04.2017 a las 21:57, Richard Heck escribió:
I will look these over and commit them if they're acceptable.
Attached are the obvious "\\" fixes that should be backported.
regards
Uwe
diff --git
"a/C:\\Users\\Usti\\AppData\\Local\\Temp\\TortoiseGit\\lyx_2_0-0271602.002.py"
"b/D:\\LyXGit\
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:30:19AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> the attached patch fixes several box reversion issues in lyx2lyx. Scott
> could verify that the conversion to LyX 2.1.x works now as expected.
Just to be clear: when I report results of ctests, it is important to
underst
El 17.04.2017 a las 21:57, Richard Heck escribió:
OK.
it is in.
I will look these over and commit them if they're acceptable.
thanks.
regards Uwe
On 04/17/2017 03:30 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> El 17.04.2017 a las 17:22, Richard Heck escribió:
>
>> OK.
>
> It is in.
>
> Attached is another fix fixing the box reversion from 2.0 to 1.6.
> Kornel verified that it works for him too OK to go in?
OK.
>> You can use git blame to identify where the cha
El 17.04.2017 a las 17:22, Richard Heck escribió:
OK.
It is in.
Attached is another fix fixing the box reversion from 2.0 to 1.6. Kornel
verified that it works for him too OK to go in?
You can use git blame to identify where the changes come from. Then we
can look at the individual commit
On 04/16/2017 11:30 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> the attached patch fixes several box reversion issues in lyx2lyx.
> Scott could verify that the conversion to LyX 2.1.x works now as
> expected. Could this therefore also go in for LyX 2.2.3?
OK.
> Another issue: when
Hi Richard,
the attached patch fixes several box reversion issues in lyx2lyx. Scott
could verify that the conversion to LyX 2.1.x works now as expected.
Could this therefore also go in for LyX 2.2.3?
--
Another issue: when I compare lyx-2_2.py in master with branch I see a
lot of
El 16.04.2017 a las 04:21, Richard Heck escribió:
OK.
Thanks, it is in.
regards Uwe
Am Samstag, 15. April 2017 um 22:21:04, schrieb Richard Heck
> On 04/15/2017 02:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > the attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion
> > routines. Could this please go in for LyX 2.2.3?
>
> OK.
>
&g
On 04/15/2017 02:06 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> the attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion
> routines. Could this please go in for LyX 2.2.3?
OK.
rh
Hi Richard,
the attached patch fixes 2 lyx2lyx issues in the box reversion routines.
Could this please go in for LyX 2.2.3?
(In master they are already fixed but I winder why the issue with
"\usepackage" instead of "\\usepackage" was fixed in master long ago but
never b
On 2017-03-28, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 03/28/2017 04:55 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> On 2017-03-28, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> It looks as if we're now ready for 2.2.3, after some of the recent work.
>>> Any reason not to freeze strings now?
>> Yes, ...
> Sorry, think there is some confusion. I was
On 03/28/2017 04:55 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2017-03-28, Richard Heck wrote:
>> It looks as if we're now ready for 2.2.3, after some of the recent work.
>> Any reason not to freeze strings now?
> Yes:
>
> * Quote styles are missing the "catchy" names from 2.2 and hard to
> discern on small s
On 2017-03-28, Richard Heck wrote:
> It looks as if we're now ready for 2.2.3, after some of the recent work.
> Any reason not to freeze strings now?
Yes:
* Quote styles are missing the "catchy" names from 2.2 and hard to
discern on small screen or for the visually impaired.
I like the "la
Go ahead.
JMarc
Le 28 mars 2017 21:00:50 GMT+02:00, Richard Heck a écrit :
>It looks as if we're now ready for 2.2.3, after some of the recent
>work.
>Any reason not to freeze strings now?
>
>Richard
It looks as if we're now ready for 2.2.3, after some of the recent work.
Any reason not to freeze strings now?
Richard
Le 11/03/2017 à 17:25, Richard Heck a écrit :
Here is a proposed patch, which sounds clear to me (no status.22x
needed). Richard?
Yes, please.
Done.
JMarc
On 03/10/2017 02:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 08/03/2017 à 10:45, Helge Hafting a écrit :
>>> FWIW, I can reproduce it. I'll have a look when I can.
>> I have debugged some more, and the problem is with explicit linebreaks
>> (ctrl+enter)
>
> Thanks Helge for the nice analysis. This prob
Am Freitag, 10. März 2017 um 20:02:38, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Le 08/03/2017 à 10:45, Helge Hafting a écrit :
> >> FWIW, I can reproduce it. I'll have a look when I can.
> > I have debugged some more, and the problem is with explicit linebreaks
> > (ctrl+enter)
>
> Thanks Helge for the ni
Le 08/03/2017 à 10:45, Helge Hafting a écrit :
FWIW, I can reproduce it. I'll have a look when I can.
I have debugged some more, and the problem is with explicit linebreaks
(ctrl+enter)
Thanks Helge for the nice analysis. This problem is not in master and is
new to 2.2.3dev.
Here is a propo
Den 07. mars 2017 22:01, skrev Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
FWIW, I can reproduce it. I'll have a look when I can.
I have debugged some more, and the problem is with explicit linebreaks
(ctrl+enter)
To crash:
start lyx, new document
type a word, press enter. (We need a normal paragraph first)
type
Le 07/03/17 à 21:32, Richard Heck a écrit :
It is not necessary to resize the screen, just get to section 2.1.1 of
the Tutorial. Scrolling or searching for "Typing, Viewing" will do it.
I can't reproduce this, though I am not using Qt5, so perhaps that is
part of the issue.
FWIW, I can reprod
On 03/07/2017 05:40 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
> I compiled & installed lyx 2.2.3, in order to check some things in the
> tutorial.
>
> git pull
>
> ./autogen.sh
>
> ./configure --enable-qt5 --with-gnu-ld --with-version-suffix=test
> CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native&qu
I compiled & installed lyx 2.2.3, in order to check some things in the
tutorial.
git pull
./autogen.sh
./configure --enable-qt5 --with-gnu-ld --with-version-suffix=test
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=native"
make -j 5
#make install
I started
Le 21/09/2016 à 22:31, Richard Heck a écrit :
commit 076736369f11016e5ed5a0a7dec0a58fc610c608
Author: Richard Heck
Date: Wed Sep 21 16:30:58 2016 -0400
Status and configure for 2.2.3.
---
Hi Richard,
I have rebased 2.2.3-staging branch on top of 2.2.x. You can now safely
delete this br
On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 12:11:42AM +0200, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> commit b1ffe775359f62043770d24aa3ec0cc4fab8f977
> Author: Guillaume Munch
> Date: Thu Sep 22 00:11:16 2016 +0200
>
> status.22x
> ---
> status.22x |6 ++
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff
68 matches
Mail list logo
