On Apr 20, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just made a colleague try LyX 2.0.3 on a Mac OS-X
>
> OS-X: 10.6.8
> LyX: 2.0.3
>
> but he immediately complained about how slow it was scrolling a very simple
> .lyx document consisting of 3 o
Hi all,
I just made a colleague try LyX 2.0.3 on a Mac OS-X
OS-X: 10.6.8
LyX: 2.0.3
but he immediately complained about how slow it was scrolling a very
simple .lyx document consisting of 3 or 4 pages of contents.
Is there any special trick needed on Mac OS-X to get from LyX what a
regular
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 03/05/2012 06:50 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
>>
>> Speaking of endnotes, what I haven't been able to find out, instead,
>> is how to have two have features often found in Humanities books:
>>
>> 1. Running headers for the endnotes that says (
On 03/05/2012 06:50 PM, stefano franchi wrote:
Speaking of endnotes, what I haven't been able to find out, instead,
is how to have two have features often found in Humanities books:
1. Running headers for the endnotes that says (automatically, of
course) "Notes for pages nnn-mmm" where nnn and m
On 03/05/2012 05:34 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Pavel, these fixes are all very minor compared to the major defect
Hello, I'm forwarding this mail to LyX-development mailing list.
(I know nothing of endnotes, maybe its not even bug...)
Pavel
of Lyx. Endnotes in most books in the Humanities have num
> 2.
>> ..
>> ..
>> Chapter 3
>> 1.
>> 2.
>> ..
>> ..
>>
>> Each Chapter's Endnotes starts with the number 1. Very, very common
>> - have a look. But Lyx cannot do this!
>>
>> Can you fix this real problem?
>>
>
blem?
>
> Joel Schiff
> Lyx user
>
> On 5/03/2012, at 8:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> >
> >Public release of LyX version 2.0.3
> >===
> >
> >We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.3. This is the third
> >maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
On 03/04/2012 05:19 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
Grateful for all the work on improving LyX, not to speak of creating it in the
first place and keeping it going over the years.
That said, the "View other formats" button still greys out and becomes unusable
after the first use. Was hoping that would be
aybe
next.
Eric Weir
On Mar 3, 2012, at 10:11 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Public release of LyX version 2.0.3
> ===
>
> We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.3. This is the third
> maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
>
> L
Public release of LyX version 2.0.3
===
We are pleased to announce the release of LyX 2.0.3. This is the third
maintenance release in the 2.0.x series.
LyX 2.0.3 is the result of on-going efforts to make our stable version
even more reliable and stable. We have
Op 1-3-2012 1:00, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck:
(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/
)
I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new
server is known to be s
Am 29.02.2012 18:57, schrieb Richard Heck:
(I now released a new installer version:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/files/LyXWinInstaller/2.0.3/ )
I'll download it. The plan is to announce the release once the new server is
known to be stable.
Can you please delete the old
On 02/28/2012 06:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck:
They've been downloaded.
As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first
installer version, I think that linking to my installer instead of
putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better.
(I now rel
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda:
>
>> The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
>> svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
>> able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
>> the 'current' officia
p.s. lyx.org is dead
Sometimes I wonder whether you actually read the Lyx developers' list ?
(hint: look for an email with the subject: "Reminder: Downtime for lyx
server - today")
Vincent
Am 28.02.2012 19:38, schrieb Richard Heck:
They've been downloaded.
As lyx.org is currently dead and I just found a bug in my first installer version, I think that
linking to my installer instead of putting it onto ftp.lyx.org is better.
(I now released a new installer version:
https://sour
Am 28.02.2012 13:14, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Any testing and comments are welcome.
I want to extensively test this before launching this as the 'official'
installer.
As said this is not completely ready to go official. it is close but there might be issues. For
example I just found
Am 28.02.2012 12:06, schrieb Pavel Sanda:
The key question is - the source code and related stuff shared in our
svn? The idea was that we have single procedure and more people are
able to build identical installer. How does the code differ from
the 'current' official one?
It is the code that i
Op 28-2-2012 12:49, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative'
which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk.
Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well?
Pavel
Pretty much yes, but not today
Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/
I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, Win 7 32bit and Win 7 64bit.
It should now be mature enough to become soon the official one.
Any testing and comments are welcome.
I want to extensively test this before launching this as t
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> The 'current' 'official' one is in branch. The 'current' 'alternative'
> which approaches the 'new' 'official' one is in trunk.
Thanks for clarification. So you are able to build as well?
Pavel
Op 28-2-2012 12:06, Pavel Sanda schreef:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?
It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I
would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented
everything you complain
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?
>
> It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I
> would be happy if you could give it a try. I think I now implemented
> everything you complained about the last time.
The key
On 02/27/2012 07:14 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/
Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were
truncated. I re-uploaded them again and they are now complete.
Sorry
I tested it quickly under Windows 7, and it worked fine. Thanks!
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> Here is my installer:
> ht
Am 28.02.2012 00:08, schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/
Sourceforge had some problems so that some of my uploaded files were truncated. I re-uploaded them
again and they are now complete.
regards Uwe
Am 27.02.2012 12:23, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternative one ?
It is close to be ready to become the official one, see my recent post. I would be happy if you
could give it a try. I think I now implemented everything you complained
Am 27.02.2012 15:56, schrieb Richard Heck:
We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binary.
I'll wait another day, but I don't see the point of delaying the release any
further.
Here is my installer:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/lyxwininstaller/
I tested it on Win XP 64 bit, W
>> Richard
>>
>
>For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here:
>
>http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
>http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg.sig
>
>and for Tiger it's:
>http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/
On 02/26/2012 07:59 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck:
Anyone planning to produce binaries?
I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around
with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.)
or should I just release the source only?
We should fir
On 02/27/2012 01:04 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck:
Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only?
Richard
For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
Op 27-2-2012 1:59, Uwe Stöhr schreef:
Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck:
Anyone planning to produce binaries?
I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around
with an Imagemagick issue, thus my delay.)
Will this be an official installer or is it again an alternat
Am 26.02.2012 um 20:45 schrieb Richard Heck:
> Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source only?
>
> Richard
>
For Leopard and better with Qt4-Carbon it is here:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/27842660/LyX-2.0.3%2Bqt4-carbon.dmg
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/278426
Am 26.02.2012 20:45, schrieb Richard Heck:
Anyone planning to produce binaries?
I'll build a Win installer tomorrow. (I'm currently fiddling around with an Imagemagick issue, thus
my delay.)
or should I just release the source only?
We should first have at least one Mac and one Win binar
Richard Heck wrote:
> Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source
> only?
If interested parties were not able to build binaries in the timeframe
of one week there is no point to wait more.
Pavel
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source
> only?
>
Ubuntu binaries are already available on the PPA.
Liviu
Anyone planning to produce binaries? or should I just release the source
only?
Richard
On 20/02/2012 10:21, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 19/02/2012 21:40, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Richard Heck
wrote:
LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
Ubuntu binaries are available on the LyX Team PPA [1]. Should anyone
trying the PPA encounter any
Richard Heck wrote:
> I never use spellcheck so don't know what changes have or have not happened
> here. Can you update this when we're ready?
I put my current understanding of hunspell machinery into
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Hunspell
troubleshooting section.
Pavel
Stephan Witt wrote:
> I've introduced the lookup for dicts in /usr/share/myspell.
> At that time I thought about a configure option too - but I didn't introduce
> one.
I just found that the lookup won't work in those dictionaries:
en_GB-oed.dic de_??_frami.dic de_??_1901.dic hu_HU_u8.dic ia.dic l
M, Cor Blom wrote:
> >>>> The only way I can understand that is that lyx is looking in
> >>>> /usr/share/myspell for the dictionaries.
> >>>
> >>> This is what seems to happen on Ubuntu Lucid. I have installed LyX
> >>> 2.0.3 with a cle
at lyx is looking in
>>>> /usr/share/myspell for the dictionaries.
>>>
>>> This is what seems to happen on Ubuntu Lucid. I have installed LyX
>>> 2.0.3 with a clean profile (no manual hunspell path specified) and LyX
>>> now automatically detects the hu
yspell for the dictionaries.
> >
> > This is what seems to happen on Ubuntu Lucid. I have installed LyX
> > 2.0.3 with a clean profile (no manual hunspell path specified) and LyX
> > now automatically detects the hunspell dictionaries located in:
> > liv@liv-laptop:~$ ls /usr/sha
Op maandag 20 februari 2012 22:39:46 schreef Liviu Andronic:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Cor Blom wrote:
> > The only way I can understand that is that lyx is looking in
> > /usr/share/myspell for the dictionaries.
>
> This is what seems to happen on Ubuntu Lucid.
On 02/20/2012 04:30 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Cor Blom wrote:
But I was set on the wrong foot by this paragraph in ANNOUNCE:
- Add the directory /usr/share/myspell as default location for dictionary
lookup of hunspell spell checker backend (a common location on linux).
Detect value change of
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Cor Blom wrote:
> The only way I can understand that is that lyx is looking in
> /usr/share/myspell for the dictionaries.
>
This is what seems to happen on Ubuntu Lucid. I have installed LyX
2.0.3 with a clean profile (no manual hunspell path specified
Cor Blom wrote:
> But I was set on the wrong foot by this paragraph in ANNOUNCE:
>
> - Add the directory /usr/share/myspell as default location for dictionary
> lookup of hunspell spell checker backend (a common location on linux).
> Detect value change of preferences path to hunspell dictiona
Op maandag 20 februari 2012 21:49:18 schreef Pavel Sanda:
> Cor Blom wrote:
> > Is this a bug, or is it intended to work this way?
>
> RELEASE-NOTES clearly states:
> System-wide hunspell dictionaries are in standard Linux installs
> looked up at /usr/local/share/lyx/dicts/.
>
I missed that. Sorr
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Cor Blom wrote:
> > Is this a bug, or is it intended to work this way?
>
> RELEASE-NOTES clearly states:
> System-wide hunspell dictionaries are in standard Linux installs
> looked up at /usr/local/share/lyx/dicts/.
Reading again, its not perhaps best written, since the the p
Cor Blom wrote:
> Is this a bug, or is it intended to work this way?
RELEASE-NOTES clearly states:
System-wide hunspell dictionaries are in standard Linux installs
looked up at /usr/local/share/lyx/dicts/.
Pavel
Op maandag 20 februari 2012 14:59:08 schreef Pavel Sanda:
> Cor Blom wrote:
> > It is building fine on all version of openSUSE. But I have a problem
> > with
> > hunspell. If I understand correctly, user or packager no longer have to
> > give an explicit directory for the hunspell dictionaries, bec
Cor Blom wrote:
> It is building fine on all version of openSUSE. But I have a problem with
> hunspell. If I understand correctly, user or packager no longer have to give
> an explicit directory for the hunspell dictionaries, because
> /usr/share/myspell is used by default. So I removed the line
Op zondag 19 februari 2012 11:18:44 schreef Richard Heck:
> LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
> http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
> Please let me know if there are any difficulties. I'll plan to release
> late this week (Friday or Saturday) if there are not.
>
>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
> Does it make sense on ubuntu to use aspell and hunspell if enchant is
> configured? I would think this adds unnecessary dependencies. Or is it what
> the official builds do?
>
Debian builds come with support for Enchant only, but I'm
Am 20.02.2012 um 10:41 schrieb Stephan Witt:
> Am 20.02.2012 um 10:21 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>
>> Le 19/02/2012 21:40, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>>> LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available fr
Am 20.02.2012 um 10:21 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Le 19/02/2012 21:40, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
>> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>>> LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
>>>
>> Ubuntu binaries are available on the LyX Team
Le 19/02/2012 21:40, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
Ubuntu binaries are available on the LyX Team PPA [1]. Should anyone
trying the PPA encounter any issues with those, please let me know.
[1] https
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
> I have installed from your PPA and it seems to be working well. Thanks!
>
Great.
> One minor point: one needs to import the key before Ubuntu can use
> that repository
>
> sudo apt-key adv --recv-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com A64833C9F
://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University
2215 Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
>> LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
>>
> Ubuntu binaries are av
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
> LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
>
Ubuntu binaries are available on the LyX Team PPA [1]. Should anyone
trying the PPA encounter any issues with those, please let me know.
[1] https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/r
eck:
>
>> LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
>> http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
>> Please let me know if there are any difficulties. I'll plan to release late
>> this week (Friday or Saturday) if there are not.
>>
>> Please note that branch is still closed.
>
Am 19.02.2012 um 17:18 schrieb Richard Heck:
> LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
>http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
> Please let me know if there are any difficulties. I'll plan to release late
> this week (Friday or Saturday) if there are not.
>
> Please no
Same positive result here on archlinux x86_64, with
Configuration
Host type:x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Special build flags: build=release use-aspell use-enchant
use-hunspell
C Compiler: gcc
C Compiler LyX flags:
C Compiler flags:
On 02/19/2012 12:34 PM, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Richard Heck comcast.net> writes:
LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please let me know if there are any difficulties. I'll plan to release
late this week (Friday or Saturday) if there
Richard Heck comcast.net> writes:
>
>
> LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
> http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
> Please let me know if there are any difficulties. I'll plan to release
> late this week (Friday or Saturday) if there are not.
LyX compiles a
LyX 2.0.3 source tarballs are available from:
http://frege.brown.edu/lyx/
Please let me know if there are any difficulties. I'll plan to release
late this week (Friday or Saturday) if there are not.
Please note that branch is still closed.
Richard
On 01/26/2012 06:02 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 26/01/12 23:46, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 01/25/2012 09:27 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
The new module has been added to trunk (r40674), and I believe it has
only introduced one string "Rnw (knitr)" which does not need to be
translated (translators
Le 26/01/12 23:46, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 01/25/2012 09:27 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
The new module has been added to trunk (r40674), and I believe it has
only introduced one string "Rnw (knitr)" which does not need to be
translated (translators can leave it as-is).
The issue is that having the
On 01/25/2012 09:27 PM, Yihui Xie wrote:
The new module has been added to trunk (r40674), and I believe it has
only introduced one string "Rnw (knitr)" which does not need to be
translated (translators can leave it as-is).
The issue is that having the new string changes the po files, even if
pe
The new module has been added to trunk (r40674), and I believe it has
only introduced one string "Rnw (knitr)" which does not need to be
translated (translators can leave it as-is).
Regards,
Yihui
--
Yihui Xie
Phone: 515-294-2465 Web: http://yihui.name
Department of Statistics, Iowa State Univers
On 01/23/2012 05:43 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 19/01/12 16:11, Richard Heck a écrit :
It has been almost two months since the release of LyX 2.0.2, and we
have collected a good number of fixes and updates, which you can find
here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
You can fi
Le 19/01/12 16:11, Richard Heck a écrit :
It has been almost two months since the release of LyX 2.0.2, and we
have collected a good number of fixes and updates, which you can find here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
You can find a list there, too, of bugs targeted to 2.0.3. Please
It has been almost two months since the release of LyX 2.0.2, and we
have collected a good number of fixes and updates, which you can find here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
You can find a list there, too, of bugs targeted to 2.0.3. Please let me
know if there are any that y
74 matches
Mail list logo
