Re: LyX 1.4.0cvs packages

2004-05-23 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 08:46:37AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Ling Li wrote: > > > Forgot to mention: Currently I "--disable-debug > > --disable-assertions" in making the 1.4.0cvs packages. If I remember > > correctly (since I disabled them long time ago), the reason to > > --disable-debug is t

Re: LyX 1.4.0cvs packages

2004-05-19 Thread Ling Li
Ling Li wrote: Forgot to mention: Currently I "--disable-debug --disable-assertions" in making the 1.4.0cvs packages. If I remember correctly (since I disabled them long time ago), the reason to --disable-debug is that the package size is way too big with debug info, and the reason to --disable-ass

Re: LyX 1.4.0cvs packages

2004-05-17 Thread Angus Leeming
Ling Li wrote: > Forgot to mention: Currently I "--disable-debug > --disable-assertions" in making the 1.4.0cvs packages. If I remember > correctly (since I disabled them long time ago), the reason to > --disable-debug is that the package size is way too big with debug > info, and the reason to --

Re: LyX 1.4.0cvs packages

2004-05-14 Thread Ling Li
Forgot to mention: Currently I "--disable-debug --disable-assertions" in making the 1.4.0cvs packages. If I remember correctly (since I disabled them long time ago), the reason to --disable-debug is that the package size is way too big with debug info, and the reason to --disable-assertions is

LyX 1.4.0cvs packages

2004-05-14 Thread Ling Li
I regularly make LyX 1.4.0cvs RPM packages for RedHat/Fedora. At first I didn't advertise my homemade packages, since guys at this mailing list usually are happy compiling from the source. However I just thought that, with LyX 1.4.0 becomes more and more mature, you (the LyX team) might want mo