On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> http://www.linuxcare.com/products/prodmore.epl?PRODUCT_GROUP=Word+Processors
>
> Should we be on it?
AFAIK it is on now. And it's rated first place along with Word Perfect right
now.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Someone HAS added LyX 1.0!
>
And it just hit the high score!
Timm
> So, we won't be forgotten... It appears there are many, many more LyX
> users out there than we can imagine. Good news.
Last weekend there was an event called 'Linuxtage' at my old university
and one of the larger sessions was on applications. LyX was the first
item on the list of specialized a
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Linuxcare is maintaining a Product Comparison page for word processors:
> >
> > http://www.linuxcare.com/products/prodmore.epl?PRODUCT_GROUP=Word+Processors
> >
> > Should we be on i
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 09:57:49AM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Linuxcare is maintaining a Product Comparison page for word processors:
>
> http://www.linuxcare.com/products/prodmore.epl?PRODUCT_GROUP=Word+Processors
>
> Should we be on it?
Someone HAS added LyX 1.0!
So, we won't be forgotte
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > Should we be on it?
> |
> | *shrug* ... spread the word I'd say.
>
> The bad thing about _not_ beeing there is that a lot of new users that
> has never heard of TeX,LaTeX,LyX... will never discover us.
>
>
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Should we be on it?
|
| *shrug* ... spread the word I'd say.
The bad thing about _not_ beeing there is that a lot of new users that
has never heard of TeX,LaTeX,LyX... will never discover us.
Lgb
> Should we be on it?
*shrug* ... spread the word I'd say.
Andre'
--
It'll take a long time to eat 63.000 peanuts.
André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linuxcare is maintaining a Product Comparison page for word processors:
http://www.linuxcare.com/products/prodmore.epl?PRODUCT_GROUP=Word+Processors
Should we be on it?
I don't like the criteria they use for "goodness" of a WP, as these favor
the "finger painting" variety rather than WYSIWYM. O
