> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> How much physical/virtual memory do you have?
Juergen> Still 128 MB physical Memory 136 MB Swap
You may try to increase drasticly your swap. A totla of 266M of memory
may not be enough to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> How much physical/virtual memory do you have?
Still
128 MB physical Memory
136 MB Swap
Let's see if downgrading cures it.
I will reboot with the new (old) kernel now.
Jürgen
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> John Levon wrote:
>> What kernel version do you run ? Try upgrading ... :(
Juergen> Oh no... I've just upgraded to 2.4.16-4GB which is the most
Juergen> recent kernel available for SuSE 7.3
How much physical/virtual me
John Levon wrote:
> what was your old kernel ? was it pre-2.4.10
No, it was 2.4.10
I am just downgrading again.
Jürgen
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 02:49:05PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I've just upgraded to 2.4.16-4GB which is the most recent kernel available for
> SuSE 7.3
what was your old kernel ? was it pre-2.4.10 ?
john
--
"All is change; all yields its place and goes"
- Euripides
On Thursday 13 June 2002 1:49 pm, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
> > What kernel version do you run ? Try upgrading ... :(
>
> Oh no...
> I've just upgraded to 2.4.16-4GB which is the most recent kernel available
> for SuSE 7.3
>
> Juergen.
Maybe this is linked to your problem? T
John Levon wrote:
> What kernel version do you run ? Try upgrading ... :(
Oh no...
I've just upgraded to 2.4.16-4GB which is the most recent kernel available for
SuSE 7.3
Juergen.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 02:29:30PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> This seems to be the relevant part. What to do?
>
> Jun 13 14:07:04 eddy kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed
> (gfp=0x1d2/0)
> Jun 13 14:07:04 eddy kernel: VM: killing process ld
What kernel version do you run
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2002 14:07 schrieb John Levon:
> If you're on linux check your kernel log, it probably decided ld
> was oom
This seems to be the relevant part. What to do?
Jun 13 14:07:04 eddy kernel: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed
(gfp=0x1d2/0)
Jun 13 14:07:04 eddy kernel: VM
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 02:13:04PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> ../boost/libs/signals/src/.libs/libboostsignals.a -lXpm -lSM -lICE -lc -lm
> -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11
> collect2: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed], core dumped
If you're on linux check your kernel log, it probably decided
At the very end of the linking process.
Has someone an idea?
../boost/libs/signals/src/.libs/libboostsignals.a -lXpm -lSM -lICE -lc -lm
-L/usr/X11R6/lib -lX11
collect2: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed], core dumped
make[3]: *** [lyx] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/juergen/lyx-deve
11 matches
Mail list logo