Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 13.10.2017, 11:45 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:11AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 13.10.2017, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Helge Hafting: > > > > > > Den 13. okt. 2017 10:10, skrev Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > > > Helge, can you please sti

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:10:11AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, den 13.10.2017, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Helge Hafting: > > > > Den 13. okt. 2017 10:10, skrev Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > > Helge, can you please still verify whether this fixes your problem? > > > > Yes, the patch fixes my

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Freitag, den 13.10.2017, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Helge Hafting: > > Den 13. okt. 2017 10:10, skrev Jürgen Spitzmüller: > > Helge, can you please still verify whether this fixes your problem? > > Yes, the patch fixes my problem. LyX 2.3 now used my format 60 > layout > file with no problems at all

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Helge Hafting
Den 13. okt. 2017 10:10, skrev Jürgen Spitzmüller: Helge, can you please still verify whether this fixes your problem? Yes, the patch fixes my problem. LyX 2.3 now used my format 60 layout file with no problems at all. Helge Hafting

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, den 12.10.2017, 13:47 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller: > 2017-10-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Helge Hafting: > > If there is a problem in layout2layout, finding it may be useful > > before release? > > > > Yes. Can you try if the attached patch fixes the problem? I have pushed the patch to

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-12 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 12. Oktober 2017 um 13:47:09, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > 2017-10-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Helge Hafting: > > > If there is a problem in layout2layout, finding it may be useful before > > release? > > > > Yes. Can you try if the attached patch fixes the problem? > > Jürgen > > > >

Re: LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
2017-10-12 11:38 GMT+02:00 Helge Hafting: > If there is a problem in layout2layout, finding it may be useful before > release? > Yes. Can you try if the attached patch fixes the problem? Jürgen > > > Helge Hafting > > diff --git a/lib/scripts/layout2layout.py b/lib/scripts/layout2layout.py ind

LyX 2.3 failure to convert from layout format 60 to 64

2017-10-12 Thread Helge Hafting
I compiled lyx 2.3 this week (from git). Today, I opened a file using one of my own layouts, and got a failure to convet the layout file from version 60 to version 64. Assuming the format change is about new features (and not depreciation of old stuff), I simply changed the version number from

Re: [patch] Layout format change for #7790

2015-12-13 Thread Georg Baum
Guillaume Munch wrote: > The attached patches take these comments into account. OK to push? Yes. Georg

Re: [patch] Layout format change for #7790

2015-12-12 Thread Guillaume Munch
take these comments into account. OK to push? Guillaume >From b615e0c6a2da03173ddd75a89c13ee086a738ec6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guillaume Munch Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:47:25 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Layout format update: AddToToc, IsTocCaption, OutlinerName Preliminary work for addressing #7790. Thanks

Re: [patch] Layout format change for #7790

2015-12-12 Thread Richard Heck
On 12/12/2015 02:54 AM, Georg Baum wrote: > Guillaume Munch wrote: > >> Le 06/12/2015 18:18, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >>> Le 05/12/2015 21:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > is it > possible to implement the format change (

Re: [patch] Layout format change for #7790

2015-12-11 Thread Georg Baum
Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 06/12/2015 18:18, Guillaume Munch a écrit : >> Le 05/12/2015 21:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: is it possible to implement the format change (which I feel is stable now) for 2.2.0 and imp

Re: [patch] Layout format change for #7790

2015-12-11 Thread Guillaume Munch
8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Heck Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:47:25 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Layout format update: AddToToc, IsTocCaption, OutlinerName Preliminary work for addressing #7790. Adding to TextClass: OutlinerName (the second string is translated) e.g.: Out

[patch] Layout format change for #7790

2015-12-11 Thread Guillaume Munch
Le 06/12/2015 18:18, Guillaume Munch a écrit : Le 05/12/2015 21:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:26:35PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: is it possible to implement the format change (which I feel is stable now) for 2.2.0 and implement the polished visible changes in 2.2.1

Layout Format

2007-08-25 Thread Richard Heck
Do the existing layout files all need their format numbers updated? They're all being run through layout2layout at the moment. rh -- == Richard G Heck, Jr Professor of Philosophy Brown University http://frege.brown.edu/heck/