Why is this here ?
john
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Why does this annoy you?
>
> Andre> Bloat?
> Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to always display this
> font-state,
You got it.
> then I agree that the lfun will be unnecessary. But I
> think Lars likes to
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to always display this
> font-state, then I agree that the lfun will be unnecessary. But I
> think Lars likes to use lfuns as interface to some things inside lyx.
I have no proble
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:20:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote:
>> Why does this annoy you?
Andre> Bloat?
It uses something like 10 lines of code, I would say.
Now, if the default for minibuffer is changed to always
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:20:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Why does this annoy you?
Bloat?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> The usual: what's the intended purpose ?
Display current font setting in minibuffer. It is not bound currently,
but I guess it may be useful as part of a command-sequence.
Why does this annoy you?
JMarc
The usual: what's the intended purpose ?
john
--
"i am sorey I cant reads yuor emale because my emale box has filtar on it
whitch says, "NO EMALES FROM PEOAPAL UNDER IQ OF 1"
- jeffk
