Re: LFUN_BIBITEM_INSERT

2008-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Isn't it the version that is used by external .bib files editors to >> insert references via the server? > > if you are talking about Bibdesk, the only used lfun i found is > citation-insert. > do you have another editor in mind? note that i haven't foun

Re: LFUN_BIBITEM_INSERT

2008-07-13 Thread Pavel Sanda
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > i spent some time on looking at LFUN_BIBITEM_INSERT code, > > but i havent found a single case how this lfun could be useful. > > > > is it just some obsolete survival, which was rep

Re: LFUN_BIBITEM_INSERT

2008-07-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i spent some time on looking at LFUN_BIBITEM_INSERT code, > but i havent found a single case how this lfun could be useful. > > is it just some obsolete survival, which was replaced by > inset-insert or what is the purpose of it?

LFUN_BIBITEM_INSERT

2008-07-13 Thread Pavel Sanda
hi, i spent some time on looking at LFUN_BIBITEM_INSERT code, but i havent found a single case how this lfun could be useful. is it just some obsolete survival, which was replaced by inset-insert or what is the purpose of it? would be somebody oposed to the removal of this lfun? pavel