Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Steve Litt wrote:
>> Can one choose not to include KDE integration?
>
> This is not KDE integration. It's just Qt using KDE's native dialog instead
> of
> LyX's home-brewn, which has always been a bad compromise.
And I guess this can be disabled at KDE level. No ne
Steve Litt wrote:
> Can one choose not to include KDE integration?
This is not KDE integration. It's just Qt using KDE's native dialog instead of
LyX's home-brewn, which has always been a bad compromise.
Jürgen
On Wednesday 17 June 2009 10:51:27 am Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Actually, I would have proposed that generally
>
> +1
>
> > if only we were able
> > to use QFileDialog::setSidebarUrls. The problem with that method is that
> > the URLs cannot be given names, so that
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > just questioning...
>
> I do not understand the question. Why should we lose them? Instead of the
> custom buttons, they will be accessible via the sidebar of the file dialog.
then its perfect. (i didn't checked how it looks like).
pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > won't we loose templates and examples directory?
> >
> > why this?
>
> just questioning...
I do not understand the question. Why should we lose them? Instead of the
custom buttons, they will be accessible via the sidebar of the file dialog.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > > this now with our custom buttons, do we? IOW, we do not lose anything
> > > (wrt the status quo) if we ditch the custom dialog, right?
> >
> > won't we loose templates and examples directory?
>
> why this?
just que
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> > this now with our custom buttons, do we? IOW, we do not lose anything
> > (wrt the status quo) if we ditch the custom dialog, right?
>
> won't we loose templates and examples directory?
why this?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> this now with our custom buttons, do we? IOW, we do not lose anything (wrt
> the
> status quo) if we ditch the custom dialog, right?
won't we loose templates and examples directory?
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Actually, I would have proposed that generally
+1
> if only we were able
> to use QFileDialog::setSidebarUrls. The problem with that method is that
> the URLs cannot be given names, so that if we add $lyxrid/clipart in
> the sidebar, it will appear as "clipart". And
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> We could have in the user
>> directory (because the sysem directory is not browsable in OS X)
>> links/
>> Clipart/ -> sysdir/clipart
>> User Clipart/ -> userdir/clipart
>> Templates/ -> sysdir/templates
>> ...
>>
>> And use some of these as needed to replace our o
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 15/06/2009 10:37, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Actually, I would have proposed that generally if only we were able
to use QFileDialog::setSidebarUrls. The problem with that method is
that
the URLs cannot be given names, so that if we add $lyxrid/clipart in
the sid
Le 15/06/2009 10:37, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Actually, I would have proposed that generally if only we were able
to use QFileDialog::setSidebarUrls. The problem with that method is that
the URLs cannot be given names, so that if we add $lyxrid/clipart in
the sidebar, it will appear as "clipar
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 13/06/2009 01:34, Richard Heck a écrit :
David Palacio wrote:
Hi,
On KDE 4.3, when using a KDE widget style, Qt applications get KDE
file dialogs for free. That is not the case for Lyx. I guess it is
because Lyx customizes the file dialog. It would be great for L
Le 13/06/2009 01:34, Richard Heck a écrit :
David Palacio wrote:
Hi,
On KDE 4.3, when using a KDE widget style, Qt applications get KDE
file dialogs for free. That is not the case for Lyx. I guess it is
because Lyx customizes the file dialog. It would be great for Lyx to
get the integration Qt
David Palacio wrote:
Hi,
On KDE 4.3, when using a KDE widget style, Qt applications get KDE file dialogs
for free. That is not the case for Lyx. I guess it is because Lyx customizes
the file dialog. It would be great for Lyx to get the integration Qt
applications have in KDE 4.
If this
Hi,
On KDE 4.3, when using a KDE widget style, Qt applications get KDE file dialogs
for free. That is not the case for Lyx. I guess it is because Lyx customizes
the file dialog. It would be great for Lyx to get the integration Qt
applications have in KDE 4.
16 matches
Mail list logo
